Dealing with Disability related absences

legal updates

When can an employer justifiably count a period absence attributable to an employee’s disability, when managing absence?

Read our disclaimer keyboard_arrow_down

This website content is intended as a general guide to law as it applies to the motor trade. Lawgistics has taken every effort to ensure that the contents are as accurate and up to date as at the date of first publication.

The laws and opinions expressed within this website may be varied as the law develops. As such we cannot accept liability for or the consequence of, any change of law, or official guidelines since publication or any misuse of the information provided.

The opinions in this website are based upon the experience of the authors and it must be recognised that only the courts and recognised tribunals can interpret the law with authority.

Examples given within the website are based on the experience of the authors and centre upon issues that commonly give rise to disputes. Each situation in practice will be different and may comprise several points commented upon.

If you have any doubt about the correct legal position you should seek further legal advice from Lawgistics or a suitably qualified solicitor. We cannot accept liability for your failure to take professional advice where it should reasonably be sought by a prudent person.

All characters are fictitious and should not be taken as referring to any person living or dead.

Use of this website shall be considered acceptance of the terms of the disclaimer presented above.

This is a common issue that arises in businesses up and down the country, long term sickness and potential disability discrimination. 

When can an employer justifiably count a period absence attributable to an employee’s disability, when managing absence? This was the topic of conversation in a recent employment tribunal case, where an employee had 66 days absence directly caused due to their ongoing disability (post-viral fatigue syndrome and fibromyalgia).

Under the employers absence management policy, such a period of time triggered a written warning being issued to her. The employee raised a grievance but with no success so issued a tribunal claim, on the basis the employer’s policy was discriminatory as it placed those suffering from a disability at a significant disadvantage. Further the employee claimed that the employer had failed to make reasonable adjustments to the policy, as per the employee’s request, to comply with their obligations under the Equality Act 2010.  The employee had requested the warning be rescinded and the whole period of absence be disregarded by the employer, or, that the threshold for triggering a written warning be raised, so as to allow those suffering from a disability more time off when required, without penalty.

The tribunal deemed that the employee’s adjustments were unreasonable, and as such ruled that the employer had not breached their duty under the Equality Act 2010. However the tribunal was keen to highlight that this case was individual to its own merits, and, as only disciplinary sanctions had been issued and not termination of the employee’s employment, the employer was seen to have acted reasonably. In the judgement it eludes to the fact that if the employee in this instance had been dismissed, the decision would have been wholly different. This would therefore would have been a very costly mistake for the employer, as discrimination compensation is unlimited.

The tribunal highlighted that employers should look to adjust absence management policies if a disabled worker is likely to be absent from work more frequently than a non disabled employee, but any adjustment should be reasonable. Therefore if employers are trying to implement something like a Bradford Factor clause into their contracts of employment, to give employees a clear indication of when levels of absence will trigger disciplinary action, this must give discretion to alter or discount levels of absence caused by a disability.

If you are currently experiencing issues with employee absence, Lawgistics members can contact the legal team, to discuss what your options are with regards to actioning disciplinary sanctions to be sure the any proposed action is reasonable.

InvolutionSTAFF UNIFORM | PROMOTIONAL WEAR | MERCHANDISE | BUSINESS GIFTS

Leading experts in print, promotional clothing, staff uniforms, branded merchandise and PPE. Involution is your brand partner for promotional marketing and workwear, a one-stop-shop for your branded marketing needs for any business size and industry.

Nona BowkisHead of Legal Services / SolicitorRead More by this author

Related Legal Updates

Employment Law: Carer’s Leave

The regulations explicitly safeguard employees from any detriment or dismissal resulting from taking or seeking to take carer’s leave.

Employment Law: Annual Leave Changes

Several significant changes came into force on 1 January 2024 that affect the statutory annual leave and pay entitlements.

The office Christmas party season is here

Where an employee makes comments concerning a person’s body parts or style of dress that are intended to be good-natured but are perceived as offensive…

Update on Rights to Flexible Working Requests

Employers will remain entitled to turn down a request pointing to reasonable grounds as a basis for refusal.

Three new employment laws for 2024

The Carers Leave Act, The Neonatal Care (Leave and Pay) Act and The Protection from Redundancy (Pregnancy and Family Leave) Act.

Parents and Carers: New Protections at Work

Parents and carers will benefit from the following new employment protections that received royal assent in May 2023.

Toilet provision in the workplace

It’s hard to imagine this sensible judgment was not a relief for all the employees involved in the use of these toilets.

Get in touch

Complete the form to get in touch or via our details below:

Phone
01480 455500
Address

Vinpenta House
High Causeway
Whittlesey
Peterborough
PE7 1AE

By submitting this quote you agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy & Cookies Policy.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.