Consumer Rights Bill

legal_updates

The expectation of the consumer is simply not the same test as the expectation of the reasonable person.

Author: Jason Williams
Published:
Reading time: 2 minutes

This article is 8 years old.

Read our disclaimer keyboard_arrow_down

This website content is intended as a general guide to law as it applies to the motor trade. Lawgistics has taken every effort to ensure that the contents are as accurate and up to date as at the date of first publication.

The laws and opinions expressed within this website may be varied as the law develops. As such we cannot accept liability for or the consequence of, any change of law, or official guidelines since publication or any misuse of the information provided.

The opinions in this website are based upon the experience of the authors and it must be recognised that only the courts and recognised tribunals can interpret the law with authority.

Examples given within the website are based on the experience of the authors and centre upon issues that commonly give rise to disputes. Each situation in practice will be different and may comprise several points commented upon.

If you have any doubt about the correct legal position you should seek further legal advice from Lawgistics or a suitably qualified solicitor. We cannot accept liability for your failure to take professional advice where it should reasonably be sought by a prudent person.

All characters are fictitious and should not be taken as referring to any person living or dead.

Use of this website shall be considered acceptance of the terms of the disclaimer presented above.

Summer/Autumn 2014 could see the biggest change in consumer rights in over a decade.

The Consumer Rights Bill has now begun its progress through the House of Commons.  From there it will be considered by the House of Lords and then will become law following the “rubber stamping” Royal Assent.

The government claims that it will make the law clearer.

No it won’t.  For at the moment there is an obvious contradiction between:

“The goods must be of satisfactory quality, based on what a reasonable person would expect”

and

“The goods must meet the expectations of the consumer”

Because when it comes to the second hand car market – the price seems to be irrelevant to most consumers who seem to think that it is perfectly reasonable for them to expect a champagne vehicle in return for lemonade money.  The expectation of the consumer is simply not the same test as the expectation of the reasonable person.

Of course, aspects of the Bill may change as it meanders through Parliament and so we will be in a far better position to pass comment on the new laws once the Bill transforms into an Act of Parliament. 

Jason Williams

Legal Advisor

Read more by this author

Getting in touch

You can contact us via the form or you can call us on 01480 455500.