Consumer Rights Act 2015-Video Evidence

legal updates

One of the more onerous clauses in the Act will be the full right to reject the goods within the first 30 days for ANY fault.

Read our disclaimer keyboard_arrow_down

This website content is intended as a general guide to law as it applies to the motor trade. Lawgistics has taken every effort to ensure that the contents are as accurate and up to date as at the date of first publication.

The laws and opinions expressed within this website may be varied as the law develops. As such we cannot accept liability for or the consequence of, any change of law, or official guidelines since publication or any misuse of the information provided.

The opinions in this website are based upon the experience of the authors and it must be recognised that only the courts and recognised tribunals can interpret the law with authority.

Examples given within the website are based on the experience of the authors and centre upon issues that commonly give rise to disputes. Each situation in practice will be different and may comprise several points commented upon.

If you have any doubt about the correct legal position you should seek further legal advice from Lawgistics or a suitably qualified solicitor. We cannot accept liability for your failure to take professional advice where it should reasonably be sought by a prudent person.

All characters are fictitious and should not be taken as referring to any person living or dead.

Use of this website shall be considered acceptance of the terms of the disclaimer presented above.

The Consumer Rights Act will all too soon be upon us and with it will arrive a whole new raft of “rights” available to the customer who becomes dissatisfied with their purchase.

One of the more onerous clauses in the Act will be the full right to reject the goods within the first 30 days for ANY fault, not just a serious fault.

This might just be a charter for Trivial Pursuits – but of a different kind! You may find, if you have not done your homework, that a perfectly sound car is rejected after the customer has completed their 5000 mile tour of Europe in 29 days, because they failed to notice a burn mark on the upholstery. The Act will entitle them to ask for a full refund, without discount for their usage, while denying you the defence of reasonableness.

Whereas such a scenario is unlikely, we would recommend you consider a better recording system to accurately establish exactly what is said at the point of sale and what is shown to the customer.

A full one minute video survey of the car, date-stamped, properly lit and in focus (of course!), showing the condition inside and out (do not forget the roof lining, door cards, bonnet and boot area) and if possible a view underneath, placed on a Jpeg file or similar, attached to the particulars of the car and stored in your Hard drive or a separate Cloud based system, would allow you to call the bluff of a bluffer!

As with all new Acts, it is not possible to say just how the Courts will interpret the intentions of Parliament, but you can bet there will be a new industry in claims for faults that previously were not countenanced.”

We are currently updating all our stationery and checklists to be compliant with the CRA 2015, please contact the Sales Team on 01480 455 500 to check when the updated forms will be available.

ECSC Group plcMore Secure

On average 55 vulnerabilities are identified daily.

What can I do?

Review your organisations priorities and ask ‘can we afford a breach?’. What do I do during an incident? Who do I involve? When do I involve the ICO?

If you’re unable to answers these questions, you need help from the experts.

Philip StricklandLegal AdvisorRead More by this author

Related Legal Updates

Legal Disputes: Why traders should avoid direct contact

The urge to sort the matter out, or attempt to, can put a strain on the process and you may find yourself in a difficult position.

The etiquette of handling consumer complaints

It is always best practice to get involved while you have the chance and follow the correct process at the very beginning.

A settlement agreement may not protect you

An agreement does not need to be in writing to be binding, but it is much easier to prove the terms of an agreement if there is a documented paper trail.

The customer isn’t always right…

As it was a defect he knew about, he cannot now claim it renders the vehicle not fit for purpose or not of satisfactory quality.

Implications, assumptions, and confusion – why being clear on your actions could be key to winning

The diagnosis showed the third-party garage had failed to repair the vehicle to a satisfactory standard and this was relayed to the consumer.

Burden of proof? Get your evidence while you can!

The burden of proof reverses for issues raised between 30 days and six months of ownership.

On your Marks… Get Set… Doh!

The TSO told our member that the consumer ought not to have experienced a failure given the age and mileage of the car.

Get in touch

Complete the form to get in touch or via our details below:

Phone
01480 455500
Address

Vinpenta House
High Causeway
Whittlesey
Peterborough
PE7 1AE

By submitting this quote you agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy & Cookies Policy.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.