Claim struck out for non-attendance

legal updates

A twelve year old van, had been sold to a business without a warranty and more than 130,000 miles on the clock.

Read our disclaimer keyboard_arrow_down

This website content is intended as a general guide to law as it applies to the motor trade. Lawgistics has taken every effort to ensure that the contents are as accurate and up to date as at the date of first publication.

The laws and opinions expressed within this website may be varied as the law develops. As such we cannot accept liability for or the consequence of, any change of law, or official guidelines since publication or any misuse of the information provided.

The opinions in this website are based upon the experience of the authors and it must be recognised that only the courts and recognised tribunals can interpret the law with authority.

Examples given within the website are based on the experience of the authors and centre upon issues that commonly give rise to disputes. Each situation in practice will be different and may comprise several points commented upon.

If you have any doubt about the correct legal position you should seek further legal advice from Lawgistics or a suitably qualified solicitor. We cannot accept liability for your failure to take professional advice where it should reasonably be sought by a prudent person.

All characters are fictitious and should not be taken as referring to any person living or dead.

Use of this website shall be considered acceptance of the terms of the disclaimer presented above.

So was the outcome of a recent hearing where the Claimant, a sole trader, failed to attend a preliminary hearing scheduled to discuss the potential requirement for expert evidence and possible settlement of the claim.

The Claimant did not explain their non-attendance, and so, the judge was minded to adjourn the case generally for the Claimant to apply to have it restored, but our member’s legal representative rightly pushed to have the case struck out there and then.

After establishing that the vehicle, a commercial van, had been sold to a business without a warranty, that it was some twelve (12) years old with more than 130,000 miles on the clock, and the Consumer Rights Act 2015 did not apply, the judge agreed the appropriate order was to strike out the claim. It would then be for the Claimant to apply to reinstate his claim, if so required, although such an application would need to be made promptly, usually within about 14 days of notice of such order.

In addition, the judge awarded our member the costs of the hearing, pursuant to CPR 27.14(2)(g), which were summarily assessed in the sum of £150.00, on the basis that the Claimant’s conduct was deemed “unreasonable” for failing to attend the hearing when suitable notice had been given to both parties. Our member managed to attend with representation, and the Claimant did not and without any explanation.

Connected Car FinanceReady to take the connected approach?

We’re here to ensure all used car dealerships deliver a better car finance experience for their customers. With over 4,000 approved dealer partners we ensure you are properly supported and connected with a range of flexible finance options, allowing you to lend and your customers to buy in complete confidence.

Howard TilneyHead of Strategy / Legal AdvisorRead More by this author

Related Legal Updates

Broker Falls Flat: Court Dismisses Flimsy Claim Against Dealer

A County Court ruling has reinforced the importance of solid evidence and clear contracts, rejecting a broker’s claim against a car dealer over an alleged pre-existing fault.

Small Claims and Expert Fees: Understanding the £750 Cap

Parties should carefully consider the necessity and proportionality of obtaining expert evidence to avoid incurring irrecoverable costs.

Buyer Beware: £4K Discovery claim falls flat in court

An opportunistic claim for nearly £9,000 on a £4,000 used vehicle was thrown out by the court, reinforcing the principle of caveat emptor in business-to-business sales.

Two Years of Lawgistics Litigation Support

Since launching Lawgistics Litigation for the Motor Trade, we’ve saved our members over £2.6 million in court claims.

Of Pedantry and Pleadings

From faulty sat navs to forgotten responsibilities, we explore how modern claims are testing the limits of common sense in legal disputes.

Concise or Incomplete? The challenges of vague pleadings by litigants in person

As online claims get shorter, your courtroom strategy needs to get sharper. Here’s why.

Recent Cases, Real Consequences – and What to Learn

From missed emails to misplaced vehicles, here are a few real-world reminders to help you avoid unnecessary headaches.

Get in touch

Complete the form to get in touch or via our details below:

Phone
01480 455500
Address

Vinpenta House
High Causeway
Whittlesey
Peterborough
PE7 1AE

By submitting this quote you agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy & Cookies Policy.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.