Check for outstanding recalls – a cautionary tale

legal_updates

A defective component caused the timing belt to snap, causing £4000 worth of damage.

Author: Dennis Chapman
Published:
Reading time: 2 minutes

This article is 9 years old.

Read our disclaimer keyboard_arrow_down

This website content is intended as a general guide to law as it applies to the motor trade. Lawgistics has taken every effort to ensure that the contents are as accurate and up to date as at the date of first publication.

The laws and opinions expressed within this website may be varied as the law develops. As such we cannot accept liability for or the consequence of, any change of law, or official guidelines since publication or any misuse of the information provided.

The opinions in this website are based upon the experience of the authors and it must be recognised that only the courts and recognised tribunals can interpret the law with authority.

Examples given within the website are based on the experience of the authors and centre upon issues that commonly give rise to disputes. Each situation in practice will be different and may comprise several points commented upon.

If you have any doubt about the correct legal position you should seek further legal advice from Lawgistics or a suitably qualified solicitor. We cannot accept liability for your failure to take professional advice where it should reasonably be sought by a prudent person.

All characters are fictitious and should not be taken as referring to any person living or dead.

Use of this website shall be considered acceptance of the terms of the disclaimer presented above.

A client takes a car in part exchange and (you’ll be pleased to know!) sold it shortly afterwards.  Not so pleasingly, a defective component caused the timing belt to snap, causing £4000 worth of damage.  We know it’s a potentially defective component because the manufacturer issued a product recall because of it. 

But that recall was in 2010 and was unknown to our client.  When approaches are made to the manufacturer they refuse to help because 2 recall letters had been sent out to the then owner but because it was not brought in for correction under the recall, they refused to assist.  This causes two problems for our client. 

Firstly, it’s potential evidence that he sold a vehicle with an inherent defect and so the proverbial buck stopped with him in so far as the buyer is concerned. 

Secondly, because our client had no contract with the manufacturer (having not purchased it from them) there is no easy claim for him to make against that manufacturer. 

The evidence is, of course, not conclusive since as we have seen with the current airbag problem, only 5 out of many, many thousands of units are defective.

As such it might be advisable when taking a car in part ex, just to check with the manufacturer (preferably by email at least noting the date/time and name of person spoken to) that there are no outstanding recalls before it gets sold on, or you could end up forking out for the manufacturer’s failings.

Dennis Chapman

In remembrance of Dennis Chapman 1951 -2015

Read more by this author

Getting in touch

You can contact us via the form or you can call us on 01480 455500.