Check for outstanding recalls – a cautionary tale

legal updates

A defective component caused the timing belt to snap, causing £4000 worth of damage.

Read our disclaimer keyboard_arrow_down

This website content is intended as a general guide to law as it applies to the motor trade. Lawgistics has taken every effort to ensure that the contents are as accurate and up to date as at the date of first publication.

The laws and opinions expressed within this website may be varied as the law develops. As such we cannot accept liability for or the consequence of, any change of law, or official guidelines since publication or any misuse of the information provided.

The opinions in this website are based upon the experience of the authors and it must be recognised that only the courts and recognised tribunals can interpret the law with authority.

Examples given within the website are based on the experience of the authors and centre upon issues that commonly give rise to disputes. Each situation in practice will be different and may comprise several points commented upon.

If you have any doubt about the correct legal position you should seek further legal advice from Lawgistics or a suitably qualified solicitor. We cannot accept liability for your failure to take professional advice where it should reasonably be sought by a prudent person.

All characters are fictitious and should not be taken as referring to any person living or dead.

Use of this website shall be considered acceptance of the terms of the disclaimer presented above.

A client takes a car in part exchange and (you’ll be pleased to know!) sold it shortly afterwards.  Not so pleasingly, a defective component caused the timing belt to snap, causing £4000 worth of damage.  We know it’s a potentially defective component because the manufacturer issued a product recall because of it. 

But that recall was in 2010 and was unknown to our client.  When approaches are made to the manufacturer they refuse to help because 2 recall letters had been sent out to the then owner but because it was not brought in for correction under the recall, they refused to assist.  This causes two problems for our client. 

Firstly, it’s potential evidence that he sold a vehicle with an inherent defect and so the proverbial buck stopped with him in so far as the buyer is concerned. 

Secondly, because our client had no contract with the manufacturer (having not purchased it from them) there is no easy claim for him to make against that manufacturer. 

The evidence is, of course, not conclusive since as we have seen with the current airbag problem, only 5 out of many, many thousands of units are defective.

As such it might be advisable when taking a car in part ex, just to check with the manufacturer (preferably by email at least noting the date/time and name of person spoken to) that there are no outstanding recalls before it gets sold on, or you could end up forking out for the manufacturer’s failings.

WeRecruit Auto LtdPermanent Automotive Recruitment from an experienced and trustworthy recruitment partner.

We cover roles within all departments and sectors of the Automotive industry, and are here to listen to your specific needs and find the most suitable candidates to fit your business.

Dennis ChapmanIn remembrance of Dennis Chapman 1951 -2015Read More by this author

Related Legal Updates

Implications, assumptions, and confusion – why being clear on your actions could be key to winning

The diagnosis showed the third-party garage had failed to repair the vehicle to a satisfactory standard and this was relayed to the consumer.

Burden of proof? Get your evidence while you can!

The burden of proof reverses for issues raised between 30 days and six months of ownership.

Claim Dismissed: No Proof of Fault at Purchase

Our member argued that numerous issues could have caused the overheating and ultimate failure.

Court Rules Against ‘Serial Returner’ in Distance Selling Dispute

It is clear from his evidence that his true intention was that he wanted the ability to reject the car at a time of his choosing.

The omni-channel approach and distance sales

The conclusion of a contract when purchasing a vehicle occurs when a deposit or the full purchase price is paid.

A New Case – What Do We Need From You?

You might be thinking, “Why do my thoughts and comments matter?”

Always prep, check, then check again

If you state that every vehicle comes with a new MOT, then ensure that they do!

Get in touch

Complete the form to get in touch or via our details below:

Phone
01480 455500
Address

Vinpenta House
High Causeway
Whittlesey
Peterborough
PE7 1AE

By submitting this quote you agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy & Cookies Policy.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.