Chargebacks and their kangaroo courts

legal updates

To clarify, a “Chargeback” is where a consumer complaints to their bank about a debit card transaction alleging that they should be refunded.

Read our disclaimer keyboard_arrow_down

This website content is intended as a general guide to law as it applies to the motor trade. Lawgistics has taken every effort to ensure that the contents are as accurate and up to date as at the date of first publication.

The laws and opinions expressed within this website may be varied as the law develops. As such we cannot accept liability for or the consequence of, any change of law, or official guidelines since publication or any misuse of the information provided.

The opinions in this website are based upon the experience of the authors and it must be recognised that only the courts and recognised tribunals can interpret the law with authority.

Examples given within the website are based on the experience of the authors and centre upon issues that commonly give rise to disputes. Each situation in practice will be different and may comprise several points commented upon.

If you have any doubt about the correct legal position you should seek further legal advice from Lawgistics or a suitably qualified solicitor. We cannot accept liability for your failure to take professional advice where it should reasonably be sought by a prudent person.

All characters are fictitious and should not be taken as referring to any person living or dead.

Use of this website shall be considered acceptance of the terms of the disclaimer presented above.

We are starting to see an increasing trend where clients are on the wrong end of “chargeback” decisions made by weak individuals who will not stand up to consumer pressure.  

To clarify, a “Chargeback” is where a consumer complaints to their bank about a debit card transaction alleging that they should be refunded as they goods purchased using that card are defective.  Such chargebacks are not prescribed in law (unlike for credit cards) and so can be more easily abused.

Especially in that banks – who provide the debit card to their customers – generally want to keep hold of them.  So when they get a complaint about a car that has been purchased on a debit card it is very easy for them to simply reverse the deal and arrange for the monies to be returned – usually via the likes of “Worldpay” or “Elavon” (amongst others) who provide the selling merchant with their card machine.  

You would expect a car dealer to be given reasonable opportunity to defend any such allegations but they are rarely given much if any notice of the money about to disappear from their account on the back of a debit card based dispute as to quality of the goods.  Even when Lawgistics provide overwhelming evidence to rebut the allegations, we find that the card providers pay little or no attention and find in favour of returning the monies back into the customer’s bank account.  

The point is they do not care about the fact that the consumer may be lying through their teeth but end up with a free car at the end of it. Now we are at the point of advising clients to actively sue the merchant provider for removing funds out of clients’ accounts when (we say) they have no legal right to do so.

Profit BoxDevelop your people like your business depends on it

What most people don’t know is that talent development doesn’t have to be complicated, high risk or expensive. Once they integrate key development stages, the results can be remarkable. Empower your team. Lead your industry. We’re your strategic learning partner, driving performance by moving skills forward.

Jason WilliamsLegal AdvisorRead More by this author

Related Legal Updates

Implications, assumptions, and confusion – why being clear on your actions could be key to winning

The diagnosis showed the third-party garage had failed to repair the vehicle to a satisfactory standard and this was relayed to the consumer.

Burden of proof? Get your evidence while you can!

The burden of proof reverses for issues raised between 30 days and six months of ownership.

Claim Dismissed: No Proof of Fault at Purchase

Our member argued that numerous issues could have caused the overheating and ultimate failure.

Court Rules Against ‘Serial Returner’ in Distance Selling Dispute

It is clear from his evidence that his true intention was that he wanted the ability to reject the car at a time of his choosing.

The omni-channel approach and distance sales

The conclusion of a contract when purchasing a vehicle occurs when a deposit or the full purchase price is paid.

A New Case – What Do We Need From You?

You might be thinking, “Why do my thoughts and comments matter?”

Always prep, check, then check again

If you state that every vehicle comes with a new MOT, then ensure that they do!

Get in touch

Complete the form to get in touch or via our details below:

Phone
01480 455500
Address

Vinpenta House
High Causeway
Whittlesey
Peterborough
PE7 1AE

By submitting this quote you agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy & Cookies Policy.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.