Catching the Storm – or Catching a Cold? The Importance of Actual Rejection

legal updates

The customer had simply left it far too late to reject and that her continued usage of the car was her legally accepting it with the alleged defect.

Read our disclaimer keyboard_arrow_down

This website content is intended as a general guide to law as it applies to the motor trade. Lawgistics has taken every effort to ensure that the contents are as accurate and up to date as at the date of first publication.

The laws and opinions expressed within this website may be varied as the law develops. As such we cannot accept liability for or the consequence of, any change of law, or official guidelines since publication or any misuse of the information provided.

The opinions in this website are based upon the experience of the authors and it must be recognised that only the courts and recognised tribunals can interpret the law with authority.

Examples given within the website are based on the experience of the authors and centre upon issues that commonly give rise to disputes. Each situation in practice will be different and may comprise several points commented upon.

If you have any doubt about the correct legal position you should seek further legal advice from Lawgistics or a suitably qualified solicitor. We cannot accept liability for your failure to take professional advice where it should reasonably be sought by a prudent person.

All characters are fictitious and should not be taken as referring to any person living or dead.

Use of this website shall be considered acceptance of the terms of the disclaimer presented above.

One of our clients recently had a court claim for over £10,000 for rejection of a car purchased in May 2019.  It was alleged that the car had an embryonic and inherent defect in the paintwork.  The Claimant says this became obvious in November 2019. Despite this, the Claimant chose not to reject the car and carried on racking up the miles.

In September 2020, one of Lawgistics’ perceived competitors (who also act for consumers) sent our client a Letter of Claim and a draft Particulars of Claim.  Again, this was not including rejection, only a claim for £7000 for repairs.

However, in December 2020, the actual court claim came in – demanding only a full rejection and nothing else.

We advised our client to go for a Summary Judgment.  This is an Application to the court, inviting it to conclude that the claim was so unlikely to succeed that it should not proceed to a full and expensive hearing.

It was argued that it took over a year after the alleged defect manifested itself for the Claimant to reject the car and, that even some 10 months after the alleged defect became visible, the Claimant was asking only for repair not to reject.

It was also argued that the Claimant had simply left it far too late to reject and that her continued usage of the car was her legally accepting it with the alleged defect.

The Application for Summary Judgment was successful and the claim was dismissed as was the Claimant’s plea for permission to appeal.

The Claimant was ordered to pay our client over £500, comprising the cost of making the Application and the fee for the advocate’s telephone court attendance.

If you want the best legal advice from a company who only advises the motor trade and not consumers, call the Lawgistics helpline on 01480 455500.

Impression Communications LtdPutting the motive in automotive

Impression works with businesses across the automotive aftermarket supply chain such as parts suppliers, warehouse distributors, motor factors and independent garages. Covering all aspects of automotive aftermarket marketing, including social media, event management, customer newsletters and PR, Impression is able to quickly establish itself within a client’s business and work towards their objectives.

Jason WilliamsLegal AdvisorRead More by this author

Related Legal Updates

Time is Money – Pay Attention!

Whether the court has made a mistake that impacts your case, or if the postman has lost your court paperwork, as soon as an issue arises, action is needed.

SHOCK & HORROR! A finance company seeks to influence an expert opinion!

Any finance house thinking of or seeking to emulate such unconscionable conduct, risks not only judicial ire and sanction but also being named and shamed.

Petty Grievances

Dealers can rest assured that the courts still take a very dim view of petty grievances blown out of proportion.

Default Judgments & Set Aside Applications – When is late too late?

This article explores the complexities and urgent timing needed to set aside default judgments in County Court, highlighting the importance of prompt legal action.

Why a good defence is essential

Delays are never helpful, and the sooner we get the claim form, the sooner we can get to work on your defence.

It pays to take professional advice on a court claim

Experience remarkable savings and expert legal support for your motor trade business with our competitively priced services.

Proceed with caution: legal pitfalls in caravan and motorhome deals

Curious if one of these vehicles is in your possession? Verify your stock and arm yourself with essential legal knowledge to navigate any potential challenges.

Get in touch

Complete the form to get in touch or via our details below:

01480 455500

Vinpenta House
High Causeway

By submitting this quote you agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy & Cookies Policy.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.