Author: Dennis Chapman
Published: June 24, 2013
Reading time: 1 minute
This article is 11 years old.
Read our disclaimer keyboard_arrow_down
This website content is intended as a general guide to law as it applies to the motor trade. Lawgistics has taken every effort to ensure that the contents are as accurate and up to date as at the date of first publication.
The laws and opinions expressed within this website may be varied as the law develops. As such we cannot accept liability for or the consequence of, any change of law, or official guidelines since publication or any misuse of the information provided.
The opinions in this website are based upon the experience of the authors and it must be recognised that only the courts and recognised tribunals can interpret the law with authority.
Examples given within the website are based on the experience of the authors and centre upon issues that commonly give rise to disputes. Each situation in practice will be different and may comprise several points commented upon.
If you have any doubt about the correct legal position you should seek further legal advice from Lawgistics or a suitably qualified solicitor. We cannot accept liability for your failure to take professional advice where it should reasonably be sought by a prudent person.
All characters are fictitious and should not be taken as referring to any person living or dead.
Use of this website shall be considered acceptance of the terms of the disclaimer presented above.
Last year the Financial Ombudsman Service dealt with 378,669 new complaints about mis-sold Payment Protection Insurance (PPI) and PPI matters presently constitutes 74% of the Ombudsman’s workload.
However, this percentage may drop next year but not to a decrease in PPI complaints but due to a worrying rise in complaints about payday lending companies. The Ombudsman is now receiving 30-40 new such complaints every month and this is a 75% increase from last year.
This article is not about the ‘rights’ and ‘wrongs’ of payday loans but it is interesting to note the seemingly sharp increase in complaints to the Ombudsman who, so far, has found in favour of the complainant debtor in three quarters of those cases.
If we see any more ‘interesting statistics flowing from the Ombudsman’s office in this regard we’ll let you know.
