Another Lawgistics Car Dealer wins in court


Dealers can and do get a fair hearing, especially with a well prepared and presented case.

Author: Nona Bowkis
Reading time: 3 minutes

This article is 6 years old.

Read our disclaimer keyboard_arrow_down

This website content is intended as a general guide to law as it applies to the motor trade. Lawgistics has taken every effort to ensure that the contents are as accurate and up to date as at the date of first publication.

The laws and opinions expressed within this website may be varied as the law develops. As such we cannot accept liability for or the consequence of, any change of law, or official guidelines since publication or any misuse of the information provided.

The opinions in this website are based upon the experience of the authors and it must be recognised that only the courts and recognised tribunals can interpret the law with authority.

Examples given within the website are based on the experience of the authors and centre upon issues that commonly give rise to disputes. Each situation in practice will be different and may comprise several points commented upon.

If you have any doubt about the correct legal position you should seek further legal advice from Lawgistics or a suitably qualified solicitor. We cannot accept liability for your failure to take professional advice where it should reasonably be sought by a prudent person.

All characters are fictitious and should not be taken as referring to any person living or dead.

Use of this website shall be considered acceptance of the terms of the disclaimer presented above.

From time to time we get dealers call in to say they have not taken the right money off a client, quite often due to a typo on the invoice. It happens.

In this case, our client had mistakenly put a 5 on the invoice instead of a 6 and so when the customer came to collect the car, only £5400 was taken and not £6400. Had the handover been completed by the same person who did the deal, this would have been picked up but in an unfortunate turn of events, the original person had unexpectedly popped out and so his colleague completed the handover.  

Later the same day, the PDQ machine receipts were checked and the error was spotted by the person who did the deal who queried with his colleague as to why he took payment of a £1000 short. It was then that the typo on the invoice came to light. Realising the error, our client called and text the customer who failed to respond. The next day, the customer emailed to ask for a bit of paper on which she said our dealer had written all the details when she first came in. We didn’t have that and I suspect she knew that, otherwise why ask?

Anyway, customer stuck to their guns and refused to pay the outstanding £1000 which meant our dealer had the choice to write it off or take the customer to court.

With our help, the dealer issued a claim and the matter ended up going all the way to a hearing as the customer stuck to their story that the deal was for £5400 and not £6400.

The invoice was obviously on the customer’s side so we had to provide enough evidence to sway the judge in our dealer’s favour. We submitted a copy of the HPI checks and valuations printed off at the time, a copy of the advert (the car was advertised for £6495) and a copy of the paperwork buying the car into stock. Together with a witness statement we put together for the client, a good advocate to argue the case in court and the dealer’s professional and calm manner, the judge ruled for us and so we got a judgment for the full £1000.

It was a lovely case to win as our client was a thoroughly decent chap and it was good to know that the judge thought so too.

This really was one of those cases that could have gone either way but as this result proves, dealers can and do get a fair hearing, especially with a well prepared and presented case.

Nona Bowkis

Legal Advisor

Read more by this author

Getting in touch

You can contact us via the form or you can call us on 01480 455500.