Email marketing when your consent is not up to GDPR standards

legal updates

So if you collected details from existing customers and had an opt out option, this marketing can continue under GDPR.

Read our disclaimer keyboard_arrow_down

This website content is intended as a general guide to law as it applies to the motor trade. Lawgistics has taken every effort to ensure that the contents are as accurate and up to date as at the date of first publication.

The laws and opinions expressed within this website may be varied as the law develops. As such we cannot accept liability for or the consequence of, any change of law, or official guidelines since publication or any misuse of the information provided.

The opinions in this website are based upon the experience of the authors and it must be recognised that only the courts and recognised tribunals can interpret the law with authority.

Examples given within the website are based on the experience of the authors and centre upon issues that commonly give rise to disputes. Each situation in practice will be different and may comprise several points commented upon.

If you have any doubt about the correct legal position you should seek further legal advice from Lawgistics or a suitably qualified solicitor. We cannot accept liability for your failure to take professional advice where it should reasonably be sought by a prudent person.

All characters are fictitious and should not be taken as referring to any person living or dead.

Use of this website shall be considered acceptance of the terms of the disclaimer presented above.

We are advising our members on the standard they must achieve if they wish to rely on consent as their lawful basis for utilising personal data for direct marketing purposes.

Direct marketing being defined in the current Data Protection Act as “the communication (by whatever means) of any advertising or marketing material which is directed to particular individuals”. 

As a reminder Article 6 of the GDPR sets out 6 lawful bases for processing personal data:

1.    Consent

2.    Necessary for a contract with the individual

3.    Necessary for compliance of a legal obligation

4.    Necessary to protect interest of the data subject or another natural person

5.    Necessary for a public interest task or official duty

6.    Necessary for legitimate interests of the controller or a third party.

While consent may seem the obvious basis for marketing activity, your pre-existing marketing databases may not meet the GDPR standard and so unless you want to do a Wetherspoons and scrap your entire marketing database, you will need to see if another base can apply. This is where ‘legitimate interests’ can come to your aid.

Octane FinanceFuel Your Finance

Octane Finance is the broker of choice for new and used car dealers nationwide. With our uncompromising service levels and our genuine and professional approach, you and your customers can trust us to deliver.

We suspect ‘legitimate interest’ will be well used. The ICO will no doubt be making sure it is not overused. So what will work?

Recital 47 of the GDPR specifically states that “the processing of personal data for direct marketing purposes may be regarded as carried out for a legitimate interest”.  This is good news and could mean we can send out marketing under the lawful basis of legitimate interest. However, we need to balance this against the requirements of the Privacy and Electronic Communications Regulations (PECR) which deals with electronic
marketing.

PECR Regulation 22 requires that a company needs consent to send a marketing email unless;

a)    the recipient is an existing customer or potential customer who has previously made an enquiry for a product or service

b)    the direct marketing is in respect to similar products and services only; and

c)    the recipient has been given a simple means of refusing (free of charge except for the costs of the transmission of the refusal) the use of his    contact details for the purposes of such direct marketing, at the time that the details were initially collected, and at the time of each subsequent communication.

So companies will need to meet the GDPR criteria for consent to marketing unless it meets the above PECR criteria which is known as the ‘soft opt-in’ rule. The ‘soft op in’ means you can send marketing to your existing customers about similar products as long as you offered them the opportunity to opt-out when you first collected their details and you offer them to same opt-out opportunity in every subsequent marketing communication.

So if you collected details from existing customers and had an opt out option, this marketing can continue under GDPR (using legitimate interest as the basis). But, you must comply with Article 21 of GDPR which gives customers the ‘right to object’ at any point.

So, if you are a service and repair garage and you email existing customers prior to the anniversary of their car service to give them details of prices, then as long as you gave them the opportunity to opt-out when you took their details and state clearly in the email that they can opt-out at any time, you will be fine to continue emailing them every year. The same will apply if you send those customers details of similar services such as winter checks or MOT deals. Your GDPR lawful basis for processing is then legitimate interests (not consent as there is no opt-in, only an opt-out).

However, if you haven’t been following the law in regard to email marketing already, then you are likely to need to start again and get consent when the customer first makes contact. 

Nona BowkisHead of Legal Services / SolicitorRead More by this author

Related Legal Updates

From Workshop to Courtroom: Garage wins after non-payment claim

A repair dispute over a BMW timing chain escalated into a courtroom battle, with allegations the garage missed deeper engine damage. The Judge sided with the garage, awarding the invoice, storage, and costs, and highlighting the value of clear notes and sensible process.

Sale or Return Car Scandals: Who really owns the vehicle when it’s sold?

Sale or Return sounds simple until it goes wrong, and recent high-profile failures show just how quickly sellers can lose control of their money and their vehicle.

Navigating the Return of Part-Exchange Vehicles

When a financed car sale is rejected, what happens to the part-exchange (and its cleared finance) is rarely straightforward.

Car Trouble Years Later: Who’s to Blame, the Customer or the Trader?

When a fault surfaces years after a sale, who carries the burden under the Consumer Rights Act 2015? Here’s the quick guide traders need to protect their position and respond confidently.

County Court Chaos: When the Portal Fails and Justice Falters

When the County Court portal went down minutes before a 4pm deadline, the response we received summed up a wider problem users now face.

Rejection Rights Aren’t ‘Refund on Demand’: What the CRA 2015 Really Expects

A vociferous rejection doesn’t trump the trader’s right to inspect or make a fair deduction for use. We unpack what “agreement” really means under the CRA 2015.

Distance Selling Rules Bite Back: Customer Loses Final Appeal in Tesla Case

A customer tried the same Tesla refund playbook twice. The first worked, the second did not, because one dealer lacked an organised distance sales scheme, and the courts have now shut the door on any further appeal.

Get in touch

Complete the form to get in touch or via our details below:

Phone
01480 455500
Address

Vinpenta House
High Causeway
Whittlesey
Peterborough
PE7 1AE

By submitting this quote you agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy & Cookies Policy.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.