Buyer Beware: £4K Discovery claim falls flat in court

legal updates

An opportunistic claim for nearly £9,000 on a £4,000 used vehicle was thrown out by the court, reinforcing the principle of caveat emptor in business-to-business sales.

Read our disclaimer keyboard_arrow_down

This website content is intended as a general guide to law as it applies to the motor trade. Lawgistics has taken every effort to ensure that the contents are as accurate and up to date as at the date of first publication.

The laws and opinions expressed within this website may be varied as the law develops. As such we cannot accept liability for or the consequence of, any change of law, or official guidelines since publication or any misuse of the information provided.

The opinions in this website are based upon the experience of the authors and it must be recognised that only the courts and recognised tribunals can interpret the law with authority.

Examples given within the website are based on the experience of the authors and centre upon issues that commonly give rise to disputes. Each situation in practice will be different and may comprise several points commented upon.

If you have any doubt about the correct legal position you should seek further legal advice from Lawgistics or a suitably qualified solicitor. We cannot accept liability for your failure to take professional advice where it should reasonably be sought by a prudent person.

All characters are fictitious and should not be taken as referring to any person living or dead.

Use of this website shall be considered acceptance of the terms of the disclaimer presented above.

So concluded a recent case where our client (the ‘Seller’) sold a 17-year-old, 150,000+ mile Land Rover Discovery for just £4,000, roughly 10% of its original value, to a business (the ‘Buyer’) intending to convert it into a recovery vehicle. The Buyer then sought almost £9,000 from our client to make this heavily used, part-worn vehicle substantially new for its intended purpose. The claim was strongly resisted and ultimately dismissed by the Court.

There were no written terms. The sale was completed informally following a conversation and sealed with a handshake. As such, an element of caveat emptor (buyer beware) applied.

Unless otherwise agreed, it was entirely reasonable to expect the Buyer to have satisfied itself as to the condition of the vehicle before parting with any money.

A report from Scotia Engineering was of limited help to the Court. However, in response to a question posed by the Seller via our sister Community Interest Company, the engineer confirmed that the vehicle’s condition was not unusual for its age, mileage and value. After all, this was an old vehicle, and it had to be judged in that context.

The Buyer claimed for repair costs and loss of business damages, which the Judge roundly rejected. The Court held that the Buyer should have expected some issues with a vehicle of this nature, taken time to inspect it properly, and satisfied itself as to its condition before committing. Relying on a few limited assurances from the Seller simply wasn’t good enough. On the facts, the vehicle was essentially sold as seen. Claim dismissed.

That said, it is unlikely this would have been the outcome had the Buyer been a consumer. But in this business-to-business setting, context and optics were everything.

If you’ve had a similar issue, whether selling or buying, why not call our legal team at Lawgistics? Our casework team is here to help you navigate tricky disputes.

Connected Car FinanceReady to take the connected approach?

We’re here to ensure all used car dealerships deliver a better car finance experience for their customers. With over 4,000 approved dealer partners we ensure you are properly supported and connected with a range of flexible finance options, allowing you to lend and your customers to buy in complete confidence.

Howard TilneyHead of Strategy / Legal AdvisorRead More by this author

Related Legal Updates

Two Years of Lawgistics Litigation Support

Since launching Lawgistics Litigation for the Motor Trade, we’ve saved our members over £2.6 million in court claims.

Of Pedantry and Pleadings

From faulty sat navs to forgotten responsibilities, we explore how modern claims are testing the limits of common sense in legal disputes.

Concise or Incomplete? The challenges of vague pleadings by litigants in person

As online claims get shorter, your courtroom strategy needs to get sharper. Here’s why.

Recent Cases, Real Consequences – and What to Learn

From missed emails to misplaced vehicles, here are a few real-world reminders to help you avoid unnecessary headaches.

Costs of issuing proceedings and becoming a “Claimant”

Lawgistics Ltd can assist you by drafting a letter before action compliant with Pre-Action Protocols as part of the service included in your membership.

Can I claim a loss of profits?

Consideration must then be given to the three elements of a loss of profit claim.

Upon receiving a new court claim, do not delay

The consequences of missing a court deadline can be catastrophic.

Get in touch

Complete the form to get in touch or via our details below:

Phone
01480 455500
Address

Vinpenta House
High Causeway
Whittlesey
Peterborough
PE7 1AE

By submitting this quote you agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy & Cookies Policy.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.