Like Abba in Waterloo, sometimes we feel like we win when we lose

legal updates

The judge decided from the off that this was a simple matter which had been horrendously over complicated ...by the consumer.

Read our disclaimer keyboard_arrow_down

This website content is intended as a general guide to law as it applies to the motor trade. Lawgistics has taken every effort to ensure that the contents are as accurate and up to date as at the date of first publication.

The laws and opinions expressed within this website may be varied as the law develops. As such we cannot accept liability for or the consequence of, any change of law, or official guidelines since publication or any misuse of the information provided.

The opinions in this website are based upon the experience of the authors and it must be recognised that only the courts and recognised tribunals can interpret the law with authority.

Examples given within the website are based on the experience of the authors and centre upon issues that commonly give rise to disputes. Each situation in practice will be different and may comprise several points commented upon.

If you have any doubt about the correct legal position you should seek further legal advice from Lawgistics or a suitably qualified solicitor. We cannot accept liability for your failure to take professional advice where it should reasonably be sought by a prudent person.

All characters are fictitious and should not be taken as referring to any person living or dead.

Use of this website shall be considered acceptance of the terms of the disclaimer presented above.

So, a court case which had been with us for 2 years finally came to its hearing.  

The customer had, quite frankly, been an arrogant character and was clearly someone who was used to getting their own way. They oscillated between acting as a ‘know it all’ but when it suited, playing the innocent poor consumer who didn’t really understand what was going on – usually when trying to get their own way when a Court Order or expert report was not to their liking.

The facts of the matter are almost irrelevant particularly as, like us, the judge decided from the off that this was a simple matter which had been horrendously over complicated (by the consumer).  In the end it came down to an issue of negotiation. Our client had a figure in mind. The consumer had a very different figure having claimed he was out of pocket to the tune of £20k. To be fair, this was probably true as they had from the very start taken a ‘win at any cost’ approach. Fortunately our client was rather more pragmatic and reasonable and once the judge gave an indication of how they may rule, consumer and their barrister had to very quickly regroup and had little choice but to come down and meet our client around the £5k mark.

So, although this was not an outright win, the consumer was certainly the biggest loser by quite a margin and, given his difficult and demanding attitude throughout, that gives both us and our client a considerable degree of satisfaction.

MotorDeskA car dealership management platform that combines all the tools your business needs into a single, unified and modern platform.

Available on all your devices via your web browser or the dedicated MotorDesk desktop and mobile apps.

Nona BowkisHead of Legal Services / SolicitorRead More by this author

Related Legal Updates

“Running Well”: Two words that cost a consumer £3,300

The judge found our member’s repairs were sound and ruled the email undercut the later allegations, dismissing the claim and awarding expenses.

The photo you didn’t take could cost you thousands

Proving a vehicle’s condition at handover is the difference between recovering costs and footing the bill.

They Broke It, You Don’t Pay: Intervening Acts that defend dealer claims

When damage stems from what a customer did after purchase, you may not be on the hook.

To strike or not to strike

Courts are reluctant to strike out a claim or defence, even where there are procedural breaches. Here’s when CPR 3.4(2) genuinely applies, why summary judgment under Part 24 may be a better route, and what judges look for before taking the drastic step.

Is the legislative framework outdated or misunderstood?

A claimant mixed pre-2015 laws with a post-2015 car purchase and the result was, frankly, embarrassing.

Come On, Baby, Light My Fire

If a car goes up in smoke, does the buyer’s insurance mean the trader escapes liability? Here’s how insurer involvement really works…

Don’t Get Soaked: The Habitation Checks That Stop Motorhome Rejections

Buyers are rejecting motorhomes for damp, leaks and unsafe cabins. Here’s what to inspect in the habitation area and why a simple pre-sale check can save you a costly Consumer Rights Act dispute.

Get in touch

Complete the form to get in touch or via our details below:

Phone
01480 455500
Address

Vinpenta House
High Causeway
Whittlesey
Peterborough
PE7 1AE

By submitting this quote you agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy & Cookies Policy.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.