Author: Jason Williams
Published: January 30, 2022
Reading time: 1 minute
This article is 3 years old.
Read our disclaimer keyboard_arrow_down
This website content is intended as a general guide to law as it applies to the motor trade. Lawgistics has taken every effort to ensure that the contents are as accurate and up to date as at the date of first publication.
The laws and opinions expressed within this website may be varied as the law develops. As such we cannot accept liability for or the consequence of, any change of law, or official guidelines since publication or any misuse of the information provided.
The opinions in this website are based upon the experience of the authors and it must be recognised that only the courts and recognised tribunals can interpret the law with authority.
Examples given within the website are based on the experience of the authors and centre upon issues that commonly give rise to disputes. Each situation in practice will be different and may comprise several points commented upon.
If you have any doubt about the correct legal position you should seek further legal advice from Lawgistics or a suitably qualified solicitor. We cannot accept liability for your failure to take professional advice where it should reasonably be sought by a prudent person.
All characters are fictitious and should not be taken as referring to any person living or dead.
Use of this website shall be considered acceptance of the terms of the disclaimer presented above.
In the eye of the storm.
Sometimes in the Lawgistics’ HQ, one gets a new case that raises an eyebrow – or even two.
This certainly was true when, last month, I was handed a file that simply beggared belief.
Outlandish, in fact.
Reading through, I saw a court claim that had been issued – minus the Defendant’s surname!
Many eyes might have passed over that Claim Form – all seemingly oblivious to the “defect”.
Claimant had simply ignored the court documents – after all, you cannot just sue “John” or “Dave”.
And so, our client was left with a completely unenforceable judgment that was many months old.
To apply to amend seemed an improbable solution, so our client had to restart from the beginning.
Claim was reissued with the full name and as I write this, I am told that he has not responded.
He will now get a Judgment in Default which, if nothing else, will be enforceable if he doesn’t pay.
Even though the error was avoidable, we are all human and make mistakes – myself included.
Reading through it again, I’ve just noticed that I forgot to put the Claimant’s first name! (I joke….!)
