Uber exciting

legal updates

19 Uber drivers challenged Uber’s position that they were self-employed.

Read our disclaimer keyboard_arrow_down

This website content is intended as a general guide to law as it applies to the motor trade. Lawgistics has taken every effort to ensure that the contents are as accurate and up to date as at the date of first publication.

The laws and opinions expressed within this website may be varied as the law develops. As such we cannot accept liability for or the consequence of, any change of law, or official guidelines since publication or any misuse of the information provided.

The opinions in this website are based upon the experience of the authors and it must be recognised that only the courts and recognised tribunals can interpret the law with authority.

Examples given within the website are based on the experience of the authors and centre upon issues that commonly give rise to disputes. Each situation in practice will be different and may comprise several points commented upon.

If you have any doubt about the correct legal position you should seek further legal advice from Lawgistics or a suitably qualified solicitor. We cannot accept liability for your failure to take professional advice where it should reasonably be sought by a prudent person.

All characters are fictitious and should not be taken as referring to any person living or dead.

Use of this website shall be considered acceptance of the terms of the disclaimer presented above.

Many of you may use Uber as a cheap way of getting around but did you know the controversy surrounding Uber and the ‘employment case of the year’ ? It may also have significant repercussions for many car dealers and anybody they use for work on a self-employed basis.

19 Uber drivers challenged Uber’s position that they were self-employed. They said that they should be considered workers for Uber and therefore entitled to their full employment contractual rights. In July 2016 the Employment Tribunal agreed with the Uber drivers saying that because of the model Uber used they should be considered as a worker and not self-employed. They are therefore now entitled to holiday pay, rest breaks, national minimum wage and other contractual benefits.

This was hugely controversial as it could have massive implications for many self-employed persons. Some Uber drivers don’t even want to be considered as workers and are quite happy being ‘self-employed’ by Uber. The Uber drivers who bought the claim say they do not have full control over their working arrangements and these are largely controlled by Uber. The opposing argument is that they are not supplied with a vehicle, can choose their own hours and do not have to work if they don’t want to. Despite having full control of when they worked if the Uber drivers were on standby they could be considered to be working as they were required to be available. It was argued that if you were truly self-employed you would be able to turn down any work you wanted.

Each case is likely to be dealt with on a case by case basis and would consider many factual questions such as does the ‘worker’ have a start and finish time, are they able to refuse work, do they have a uniform and many other questions to determine if they are technically self-employed. Tribunals will look beyond the term self-employed to see the actual status of the person and so it may be worth seeking advice if you use people to carry out work on this basis.

Uber have recently been given permission to appeal this decision and the case is likely to be heard in September. We will keep you up to date.

DMS NavigatorDealer Management System software for Car Sales, Aftersales and eCommerce

Our dealers use us to help them be more Efficient and Profitable!

You can use our Dealer and Lead Management software to integrate all dealership departments, both online and physical ; providing all in-house functions; Invoicing, Stock Management, Accounting and Marketing as well as interfacing for advertising, ecommerce and more.

Jason WilliamsLegal AdvisorRead More by this author

Related Legal Updates

Extension of Redundancy Protection for Pregnancy and New Parents

Explore the strengthened redundancy protections for new parents with significant amendments to maternity, adoption, and shared parental leave rights, effective from April 2024, ensuring enhanced job security during critical family milestones.

Changes to Flexible Working

Unveil the new landscape of flexible working rights with the Employment Relations (Flexible Working) Act 2023, now granting ‘day-one’ rights to employees and setting a precedent for more adaptable workplace practices effective from 6 April 2024.

New employment legislation effective from 6 April 2024

Enhanced employee rights, offering day-one entitlements to carer’s leave, flexible working arrangements, and extended redundancy protection for pregnant employees and those on family leave.

Wages increasing from 1 April 2024

With effect from 1 April 2024, the hourly rates of pay are…

Employment Law: Carer’s Leave

The regulations explicitly safeguard employees from any detriment or dismissal resulting from taking or seeking to take carer’s leave.

Employment Law: Annual Leave Changes

Several significant changes came into force on 1 January 2024 that affect the statutory annual leave and pay entitlements.

The office Christmas party season is here

Where an employee makes comments concerning a person’s body parts or style of dress that are intended to be good-natured but are perceived as offensive…

Get in touch

Complete the form to get in touch or via our details below:

01480 455500

Vinpenta House
High Causeway

By submitting this quote you agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy & Cookies Policy.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.