Author: Ernie Taylor
Published: January 9, 2018
Reading time: 2 minutes
This article is 4 years old.
Read our disclaimer keyboard_arrow_down
This website content is intended as a general guide to law as it applies to the motor trade. Lawgistics has taken every effort to ensure that the contents are as accurate and up to date as at the date of first publication.
The laws and opinions expressed within this website may be varied as the law develops. As such we cannot accept liability for or the consequence of, any change of law, or official guidelines since publication or any misuse of the information provided.
The opinions in this website are based upon the experience of the authors and it must be recognised that only the courts and recognised tribunals can interpret the law with authority.
Examples given within the website are based on the experience of the authors and centre upon issues that commonly give rise to disputes. Each situation in practice will be different and may comprise several points commented upon.
If you have any doubt about the correct legal position you should seek further legal advice from Lawgistics or a suitably qualified solicitor. We cannot accept liability for your failure to take professional advice where it should reasonably be sought by a prudent person.
All characters are fictitious and should not be taken as referring to any person living or dead.
Use of this website shall be considered acceptance of the terms of the disclaimer presented above.
In this case the Company and its Director have been fined after failing to comply with Improvement Notices (IN) issued by the HSE.
Manchester Magistrates’ Court heard that Rochdale MOT Centre Limited and its Director failed to comply with three Improvement Notices that required the Thorough Examination of three two-post vehicle lifts by the specified dates in the Notices. HSE investigated the premises in Rochdale after being alerted to the company by the Local Authority. A failure to comply with an Improvement Notice is in itself a criminal offence; being a breach of Section 33(1)(g) of the Health and Safety at Work Act 1974. The business and its Director was ordered to pay fines of £1,500 and £3,000 respectively. Both defendants were also ordered to pay the full costs of £15,609.14.
Speaking after the hearing HSE inspector Sarah Taylor said: “This case highlights the impact of HSE’s work, ensuring duty holders are held to account for their failings and taking the appropriate action to ensure workers safety.” She added; “All workers have the right to return home from work safe and healthy, both the company and director in this case placed employees at risk of harm by failing to address concerns raised by HSE inspectors