The Financial Ombudsman (FOS) and complaints

legal updates

The problem with FOS decisions is that they can go wider than the law.

Read our disclaimer keyboard_arrow_down

This website content is intended as a general guide to law as it applies to the motor trade. Lawgistics has taken every effort to ensure that the contents are as accurate and up to date as at the date of first publication.

The laws and opinions expressed within this website may be varied as the law develops. As such we cannot accept liability for or the consequence of, any change of law, or official guidelines since publication or any misuse of the information provided.

The opinions in this website are based upon the experience of the authors and it must be recognised that only the courts and recognised tribunals can interpret the law with authority.

Examples given within the website are based on the experience of the authors and centre upon issues that commonly give rise to disputes. Each situation in practice will be different and may comprise several points commented upon.

If you have any doubt about the correct legal position you should seek further legal advice from Lawgistics or a suitably qualified solicitor. We cannot accept liability for your failure to take professional advice where it should reasonably be sought by a prudent person.

All characters are fictitious and should not be taken as referring to any person living or dead.

Use of this website shall be considered acceptance of the terms of the disclaimer presented above.

We often get calls from car dealers who feel they are being pushed into a corner by a finance company following a customer complaint.

The usual scenario is that the customer has complained about a fault which the dealer has not upheld and so the customer has marched off to the finance company who worry about the complaint being escalated to the FOS.

The problem with FOS decisions is that they can go wider than the law which basically means they can come to any decision the person investigating thinks fit. This does lead to some bizarre and unfair decisions on which there is no appeal once the FOS system is exhausted.

However, the customer is entitled to complain to the finance provider as

  1. the car will belong to the finance company until the finance is cleared
  2. the finance company will have ‘joint and several liability’ for the vehicle.  

Unfortunately, many of the finance companies now take a soft approach towards the customer on the basis that

  1. they feel the FOS will rule against them regardless and
  2. if they pay the customer, they simply look to the dealer to reimburse them and so there is no real loss to them.

This can put the dealer at a disadvantage but this shouldn’t mean that dealers roll over and we quite often have backs and forths with finance companies on behalf of our clients which lead to the finance company either backing the dealer or coming to a mutually satisfactory deal on the loss or agreeing to take the hit themselves and not pursue our client at all. Obviously each case will have different facts but there are plenty of finance companies out there and so if one wants your business, you need to be sure that your account manager is as willing to look after your interests as much as their own and their customers.

Lawgistics members can get advice on problems arising from dealing with finance companies by contacting the Legal Team.

DMS NavigatorDealer Management System software for Car Sales, Aftersales and eCommerce

Our dealers use us to help them be more Efficient and Profitable!

You can use our Dealer and Lead Management software to integrate all dealership departments, both online and physical ; providing all in-house functions; Invoicing, Stock Management, Accounting and Marketing as well as interfacing for advertising, ecommerce and more.

Nona BowkisHead of Legal Services / SolicitorRead More by this author

Related Legal Updates

Honest guv, it was a mistake!

It is useful to know that if an employee has made a mistake, it is not that employee who is deemed liable.

Implications, assumptions, and confusion – why being clear on your actions could be key to winning

The diagnosis showed the third-party garage had failed to repair the vehicle to a satisfactory standard and this was relayed to the consumer.

Burden of proof? Get your evidence while you can!

The burden of proof reverses for issues raised between 30 days and six months of ownership.

Did you know that finance companies and brokers are psychic?

Our advice is don’t be bullied by them. But, that advice comes with a warning too.

Claim Dismissed: No Proof of Fault at Purchase

Our member argued that numerous issues could have caused the overheating and ultimate failure.

Finance Company Unhappy with Court Ruling

The court found that the claim and particulars were inadequate and the finance company was told they had to submit a compliant claim/particulars.

Court Rules Against ‘Serial Returner’ in Distance Selling Dispute

It is clear from his evidence that his true intention was that he wanted the ability to reject the car at a time of his choosing.

Get in touch

Complete the form to get in touch or via our details below:

Phone
01480 455500
Address

Vinpenta House
High Causeway
Whittlesey
Peterborough
PE7 1AE

By submitting this quote you agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy & Cookies Policy.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.