Terms and Conditions – can verbal or discretionary agreements become binding?


Make sure the policy documents are clear and do not conflict with any other documents, such as contracts.

Author: Dennis Chapman
Reading time: 2 minutes

This article is 9 years old.

Read our disclaimer keyboard_arrow_down

This website content is intended as a general guide to law as it applies to the motor trade. Lawgistics has taken every effort to ensure that the contents are as accurate and up to date as at the date of first publication.

The laws and opinions expressed within this website may be varied as the law develops. As such we cannot accept liability for or the consequence of, any change of law, or official guidelines since publication or any misuse of the information provided.

The opinions in this website are based upon the experience of the authors and it must be recognised that only the courts and recognised tribunals can interpret the law with authority.

Examples given within the website are based on the experience of the authors and centre upon issues that commonly give rise to disputes. Each situation in practice will be different and may comprise several points commented upon.

If you have any doubt about the correct legal position you should seek further legal advice from Lawgistics or a suitably qualified solicitor. We cannot accept liability for your failure to take professional advice where it should reasonably be sought by a prudent person.

All characters are fictitious and should not be taken as referring to any person living or dead.

Use of this website shall be considered acceptance of the terms of the disclaimer presented above.

In a recent Court of Appeal Case, it was discussed whether a group wide policy of enhanced redundancy payments could become an implied term of an employee’s contract of employment, if that employee worked in a subsidiary branch of that group.

It is widely recognised that custom and practice can imply terms into the employment relationship, for example when an employee does not sign a contract of employment but continues in your employment. In this situation the employees actions in practice would infer their agreement to the terms of the contract. Can the same be said for discretionary policy’s that are regularly adopted within a Company?

In this case, four employees had been made redundant, they were only paid a statutory redundancy payment. The Company had an enhanced redundancy payment policy in their group HR manual, and this was a group wide policy that has previously been implemented. They collectively took their employer to Tribunal and claimed that they were entitled to an enhanced redundancy payment, as it was an implied term of their contract of employment.

This argument was not accepted by the Tribunal and the Claimants case was rejected. The Tribunal held that as this policy had not actually been brought to the employees attention as applying to their particular branch, despite it being available on request from the group HR department. Also the Tribunal held that as this branch had not made enhanced payments to any previous employees it was not applicable in this case.

The matter was taken to appeal where they overturned the Tribunals decision. The Court Appeal ordered the matter be re heard at another Tribunal. The outcome of which is yet to be released. The case does show that there are obvious factions of thought when it comes to discretionary policies and Companies should therefore think carefully when looking to implement anything on a discretionary level. Make sure the policy documents are clear and do not conflict with any other documents, such as contracts, or, if you are part of a group, and group wide policy. It should be clearly stated what is purely discretionary and what is not.

Dennis Chapman

In remembrance of Dennis Chapman 1951 -2015

Read more by this author

Getting in touch

You can contact us via the form or you can call us on 01480 455500.