Supreme Court sends yet another reminder that Court Orders must be followed

legal updates

A court will sometimes issue an ‘unless order’.

Read our disclaimer keyboard_arrow_down

This website content is intended as a general guide to law as it applies to the motor trade. Lawgistics has taken every effort to ensure that the contents are as accurate and up to date as at the date of first publication.

The laws and opinions expressed within this website may be varied as the law develops. As such we cannot accept liability for or the consequence of, any change of law, or official guidelines since publication or any misuse of the information provided.

The opinions in this website are based upon the experience of the authors and it must be recognised that only the courts and recognised tribunals can interpret the law with authority.

Examples given within the website are based on the experience of the authors and centre upon issues that commonly give rise to disputes. Each situation in practice will be different and may comprise several points commented upon.

If you have any doubt about the correct legal position you should seek further legal advice from Lawgistics or a suitably qualified solicitor. We cannot accept liability for your failure to take professional advice where it should reasonably be sought by a prudent person.

All characters are fictitious and should not be taken as referring to any person living or dead.

Use of this website shall be considered acceptance of the terms of the disclaimer presented above.

A recent Supreme Court Case saw seven of the very best judges in the land consider how to deal with a party not complying with a Court Order.

A court will sometimes issue an ‘unless order’. An unless order is just as it sounds, i.e. unless you do A by a certain date, you will suffer the consequences. In this case, Thevarajah (Respondent) v Riordan and others (Appellants) [2015] UKSC 78,  one of the parties was ordered to disclose assets by way of an unless order by 1 July 2013. The party only disclosed some of their assets and so failed to fully meet the order meaning their defence was essentially thrown out.

They appealed this decision (twice) and it was overturned. The other side didn’t like that much and so themselves appealed to the Court Of Appeal who reversed the decision to overturn meaning the party were back in the position of not being allowed to submit their defence.  In response, an appeal against that decision was made to the Supreme Court who agreed with the Court of Appeal and so the defence was not allowed. I dread to think how much the legal fees were for each party as an appeal in the county court can cost a few thousand pounds and so pursuing it up to the Court of Appeal and then on to the Supreme Court could well have cost the best part of £100,000, maybe more.

A costly business and a timely reminder that if you have an Order from the court, follow it. If you don’t know what to do, contact us.   

Impression Communications LtdPutting the motive in automotive

Impression works with businesses across the automotive aftermarket supply chain such as parts suppliers, warehouse distributors, motor factors and independent garages. Covering all aspects of automotive aftermarket marketing, including social media, event management, customer newsletters and PR, Impression is able to quickly establish itself within a client’s business and work towards their objectives.

Nona BowkisHead of Legal Services / SolicitorRead More by this author

Related Legal Updates

From Workshop to Courtroom: Garage wins after non-payment claim

A repair dispute over a BMW timing chain escalated into a courtroom battle, with allegations the garage missed deeper engine damage. The Judge sided with the garage, awarding the invoice, storage, and costs, and highlighting the value of clear notes and sensible process.

Sale or Return Car Scandals: Who really owns the vehicle when it’s sold?

Sale or Return sounds simple until it goes wrong, and recent high-profile failures show just how quickly sellers can lose control of their money and their vehicle.

Navigating the Return of Part-Exchange Vehicles

When a financed car sale is rejected, what happens to the part-exchange (and its cleared finance) is rarely straightforward.

Car Trouble Years Later: Who’s to Blame, the Customer or the Trader?

When a fault surfaces years after a sale, who carries the burden under the Consumer Rights Act 2015? Here’s the quick guide traders need to protect their position and respond confidently.

County Court Chaos: When the Portal Fails and Justice Falters

When the County Court portal went down minutes before a 4pm deadline, the response we received summed up a wider problem users now face.

Rejection Rights Aren’t ‘Refund on Demand’: What the CRA 2015 Really Expects

A vociferous rejection doesn’t trump the trader’s right to inspect or make a fair deduction for use. We unpack what “agreement” really means under the CRA 2015.

Distance Selling Rules Bite Back: Customer Loses Final Appeal in Tesla Case

A customer tried the same Tesla refund playbook twice. The first worked, the second did not, because one dealer lacked an organised distance sales scheme, and the courts have now shut the door on any further appeal.

Get in touch

Complete the form to get in touch or via our details below:

Phone
01480 455500
Address

Vinpenta House
High Causeway
Whittlesey
Peterborough
PE7 1AE

By submitting this quote you agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy & Cookies Policy.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.