Stellantis stop/drive fallout: Speculative claims and what dealers should do next

legal updates

After the Stellantis stop/drive notice, some consumers are trying their luck, even years after purchase. DVSA advice remains to pass and advise, so take legal advice before engaging with threats of court action.

Read our disclaimer keyboard_arrow_down

This website content is intended as a general guide to law as it applies to the motor trade. Lawgistics has taken every effort to ensure that the contents are as accurate and up to date as at the date of first publication.

The laws and opinions expressed within this website may be varied as the law develops. As such we cannot accept liability for or the consequence of, any change of law, or official guidelines since publication or any misuse of the information provided.

The opinions in this website are based upon the experience of the authors and it must be recognised that only the courts and recognised tribunals can interpret the law with authority.

Examples given within the website are based on the experience of the authors and centre upon issues that commonly give rise to disputes. Each situation in practice will be different and may comprise several points commented upon.

If you have any doubt about the correct legal position you should seek further legal advice from Lawgistics or a suitably qualified solicitor. We cannot accept liability for your failure to take professional advice where it should reasonably be sought by a prudent person.

All characters are fictitious and should not be taken as referring to any person living or dead.

Use of this website shall be considered acceptance of the terms of the disclaimer presented above.

Dealers are receiving template-style claims from consumers with no actual vehicle issues following the Stellantis stop/drive notice. DVSA guidance still says pass the MOT with a manual advisory, so most of these demands look speculative, but don’t ignore them.

Some months after Stellantis issued a stop/drive notice, dealers are still receiving what we would describe as ‘ambulance-chasing’ claims from consumers who purchased one of the vehicles listed as part of the notice.

To be clear, these are consumers who have had absolutely no issues with their vehicle. Some are trying to claim against vehicles they purchased five years ago and have been happily and safely driving ever since. Whilst, at Lawgistics, we have not received any follow-ups to the letters we have written on behalf of clients in defence of these claims, we are hearing multiple reports of dealers being sent follow-up threats of court action.

The DVSA’s official advice to MOT testers (MOT special notice 03-25) remains to pass any vehicles listed in the notice and to issue a ‘manual advisory’ with the following text: “This vehicle has an outstanding recall. Contact Citroën for information and to arrange a free repair.”

As the DVSA is the government agency with responsibility for ensuring that drivers and vehicles meet stringent safety standards, and is the body responsible for monitoring recalls, we would suggest that these claims are speculative at best. That is not to say there may not be arguments in some cases, which may explain why some dealers are being pursued. Dealers should still take proper legal advice on receipt of a potential claim to avoid exposure to outrageous credit-hire costs.

If you receive one of these letters, speak to our legal team via the Lawgistics telephone helpline or casework service before you respond.

InvolutionSTAFF UNIFORM | PROMOTIONAL WEAR | MERCHANDISE | BUSINESS GIFTS

Leading experts in print, promotional clothing, staff uniforms, branded merchandise and PPE. Involution is your brand partner for promotional marketing and workwear, a one-stop-shop for your branded marketing needs for any business size and industry.

Nona BowkisHead of Legal Services / SolicitorRead More by this author

Related Legal Updates

Car Trouble Years Later: Who’s to Blame, the Customer or the Trader?

When a fault surfaces years after a sale, who carries the burden under the Consumer Rights Act 2015? Here’s the quick guide traders need to protect their position and respond confidently.

County Court Chaos: When the Portal Fails and Justice Falters

When the County Court portal went down minutes before a 4pm deadline, the response we received summed up a wider problem users now face.

Rejection Rights Aren’t ‘Refund on Demand’: What the CRA 2015 Really Expects

A vociferous rejection doesn’t trump the trader’s right to inspect or make a fair deduction for use. We unpack what “agreement” really means under the CRA 2015.

Distance Selling Rules Bite Back: Customer Loses Final Appeal in Tesla Case

A customer tried the same Tesla refund playbook twice. The first worked, the second did not, because one dealer lacked an organised distance sales scheme, and the courts have now shut the door on any further appeal.

FCA’s Motor Finance Crackdown: Has the horse already bolted?

The FCA has opened an enforcement investigation into a CMC over motor finance claims, but critics say this should have happened years ago.

Blue Monday 2026: The shocking HSE numbers every employer should see

Feeling the January slump? Fresh HSE data shows stress and anxiety are rising fast and costing millions of working days.

Sold a Car and Now They Want a Refund? The Truth About “No Mental Capacity”

A refund demand lands after the sale, claiming the buyer lacked mental capacity. Here’s how to handle these calls, what actually counts as evidence, and when a contract could be void.

Get in touch

Complete the form to get in touch or via our details below:

Phone
01480 455500
Address

Vinpenta House
High Causeway
Whittlesey
Peterborough
PE7 1AE

By submitting this quote you agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy & Cookies Policy.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.