Some Section 75 good news

legal updates

As a reminder, credit card companies can give a full refund to customers who use a credit card to purchase a car for a value between £100 and £30,000.

Read our disclaimer keyboard_arrow_down

This website content is intended as a general guide to law as it applies to the motor trade. Lawgistics has taken every effort to ensure that the contents are as accurate and up to date as at the date of first publication.

The laws and opinions expressed within this website may be varied as the law develops. As such we cannot accept liability for or the consequence of, any change of law, or official guidelines since publication or any misuse of the information provided.

The opinions in this website are based upon the experience of the authors and it must be recognised that only the courts and recognised tribunals can interpret the law with authority.

Examples given within the website are based on the experience of the authors and centre upon issues that commonly give rise to disputes. Each situation in practice will be different and may comprise several points commented upon.

If you have any doubt about the correct legal position you should seek further legal advice from Lawgistics or a suitably qualified solicitor. We cannot accept liability for your failure to take professional advice where it should reasonably be sought by a prudent person.

All characters are fictitious and should not be taken as referring to any person living or dead.

Use of this website shall be considered acceptance of the terms of the disclaimer presented above.

My last update discussed payments by credit cards and the extra protection this gives to the consumer. One of our ongoing cases I mentioned has now been resolved to the benefit, yes the benefit, of the car dealer.

As a reminder, credit card companies can give a full refund to customers who use a credit card to purchase a car for a value between £100 and £30,000. The amount of the refund is then claimed back from the dealer and so it’s fair to say that credit card companies don’t really need to put much effort into their decision making as they just pass any  loss onto the dealer.

In this latest case, a customer bought a vehicle and a part payment was made by a third party on their credit card. The customer was unhappy with the vehicle and the third party asked the credit card company for a Section 75 refund. Unbelievably, the credit card company gave their customer a refund of the full purchase price of the car. I say unbelievably as under Section 75 of the Consumer Credit Act there has to be what is known as a ‘creditor-debtor-supplier’ agreement. This essentially means that the person buying the goods is also the person named on the credit card – clearly not the case here.

After submitting our legal arguments to the credit card company, they accepted our position and agreed to not pursue our dealer for the amount they paid out. So, the credit card company take the hit of the loss and our dealer gets the car (which the customer handed back to get the refund) and the money from the original sale. All in all, not a bad day at the office.

DMS NavigatorDealer Management System software for Car Sales, Aftersales and eCommerce

Our dealers use us to help them be more Efficient and Profitable!

You can use our Dealer and Lead Management software to integrate all dealership departments, both online and physical ; providing all in-house functions; Invoicing, Stock Management, Accounting and Marketing as well as interfacing for advertising, ecommerce and more.

Nona BowkisHead of Legal Services / SolicitorRead More by this author

Related Legal Updates

Legal Disputes: Why traders should avoid direct contact

The urge to sort the matter out, or attempt to, can put a strain on the process and you may find yourself in a difficult position.

The etiquette of handling consumer complaints

It is always best practice to get involved while you have the chance and follow the correct process at the very beginning.

A settlement agreement may not protect you

An agreement does not need to be in writing to be binding, but it is much easier to prove the terms of an agreement if there is a documented paper trail.

Implications, assumptions, and confusion – why being clear on your actions could be key to winning

The diagnosis showed the third-party garage had failed to repair the vehicle to a satisfactory standard and this was relayed to the consumer.

Burden of proof? Get your evidence while you can!

The burden of proof reverses for issues raised between 30 days and six months of ownership.

Claim Dismissed: No Proof of Fault at Purchase

Our member argued that numerous issues could have caused the overheating and ultimate failure.

Court Rules Against ‘Serial Returner’ in Distance Selling Dispute

It is clear from his evidence that his true intention was that he wanted the ability to reject the car at a time of his choosing.

Get in touch

Complete the form to get in touch or via our details below:

Phone
01480 455500
Address

Vinpenta House
High Causeway
Whittlesey
Peterborough
PE7 1AE

By submitting this quote you agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy & Cookies Policy.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.