Small Claims – Paying the Cost(s)

legal updates

When we tell you to settle claims with finance companies because it is too financially risky to go to court, this particular exemption will often be the reason for our advice.

Read our disclaimer keyboard_arrow_down

This website content is intended as a general guide to law as it applies to the motor trade. Lawgistics has taken every effort to ensure that the contents are as accurate and up to date as at the date of first publication.

The laws and opinions expressed within this website may be varied as the law develops. As such we cannot accept liability for or the consequence of, any change of law, or official guidelines since publication or any misuse of the information provided.

The opinions in this website are based upon the experience of the authors and it must be recognised that only the courts and recognised tribunals can interpret the law with authority.

Examples given within the website are based on the experience of the authors and centre upon issues that commonly give rise to disputes. Each situation in practice will be different and may comprise several points commented upon.

If you have any doubt about the correct legal position you should seek further legal advice from Lawgistics or a suitably qualified solicitor. We cannot accept liability for your failure to take professional advice where it should reasonably be sought by a prudent person.

All characters are fictitious and should not be taken as referring to any person living or dead.

Use of this website shall be considered acceptance of the terms of the disclaimer presented above.

Let this be a warning to all car dealers wanting to do battle with certain finance companies where the claim amount is less than the £10,000 threshold for small claims court. It especially applies when the trader’s position is the issue complained of makes little or no difference, and thus, it does not render the car not of “satisfactory quality” or “fit for purpose”.

Part 27 of the Civil Procedure Rules governs most types of contractual disputes that are under £10,000 and thus fall within the small claims track. In essence, Part 27 states the general rule of the “winner pays the loser’s legal costs” does not apply to such claims. In other words, win or lose, you have to pay your own legal costs. However, there are several exemptions. One such exemption is when a party has behaved with conduct that is deemed unreasonable (a very high bar to succeed) and, as such, they should have to incur the other party’s legal costs.

A second exemption that often applies is when two businesses agree to a contract stating even if a court claim is below the £10,000 small claims limit, legal costs are nevertheless recoverable by the “winner” from the “loser”. This is particularly relevant when traders agree to a contract of business with a finance company and, sometimes, even a broker. You may not have even read or considered the implications of this contractual clause when you signed up several years ago, but the clause has big teeth and is ready to bite you on the bottom!

So, we have seen several cases where the finance company has succeeded in a claim for, say £2000, and then whips out that clause and receives another £4000 in legal costs awarded. Case law has made this possible and it is binding on the contracting parties. So, be warned! 

When we tell you to settle claims with finance companies because it is too financially risky to go to court, this particular exemption will often be the reason for our advice.

And for the avoidance of doubt, you simply cannot impose such a term when you sell a car to 86- year-old Mrs Jones – no matter how big you make it on your invoice and no matter how many times you ask her to sign under it!

HowdenCompetitive, comprehensive, quick

One of the largest independent specialist motor trade brokers in the UK. Our extensive history of supplying insurance to the motor trade means we understand your business needs. By partnering with a specialist insurance broker like us, you get exactly what you need to protect your business.

Jason WilliamsLegal AdvisorRead More by this author

Related Legal Updates

Finance Company Unhappy with Court Ruling

The court found that the claim and particulars were inadequate and the finance company was told they had to submit a compliant claim/particulars.

Disclose or not to disclose, that is the question

It is imperative that you know what is required to be disclosed, when to disclose the documents, and what your legal duty is both before proceedings and when a claim is issued.

Detailed records avoid post-sale issues

The Claimant was only entitled to compensation for the cost of repairs to the locks, which were considered likely to have been faulty at the point of sale and was awarded £385.

Claimant failed to satisfy the burden of proof

No real evidence to suggest the extant problems with his vehicle were in any way related to the repairs that had been undertaken

Metadata matters! Proving dates of evidence

Metadata means “data about data” and is defined as “the data providing information about one or more aspects of the data in question.”

I’m On The Register!!

If a judgment in default is issued, a CCJ is recorded immediately on the relevant credit file.

Have motor finance lenders scored an own goal?

A clear admission from two large motor finance lenders that they have no clue as to what their dealer networks are doing.

Get in touch

Complete the form to get in touch or via our details below:

Phone
01480 455500
Address

Vinpenta House
High Causeway
Whittlesey
Peterborough
PE7 1AE

By submitting this quote you agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy & Cookies Policy.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.