Small Claims – Paying the Cost(s)

legal updates

When we tell you to settle claims with finance companies because it is too financially risky to go to court, this particular exemption will often be the reason for our advice.

Read our disclaimer keyboard_arrow_down

This website content is intended as a general guide to law as it applies to the motor trade. Lawgistics has taken every effort to ensure that the contents are as accurate and up to date as at the date of first publication.

The laws and opinions expressed within this website may be varied as the law develops. As such we cannot accept liability for or the consequence of, any change of law, or official guidelines since publication or any misuse of the information provided.

The opinions in this website are based upon the experience of the authors and it must be recognised that only the courts and recognised tribunals can interpret the law with authority.

Examples given within the website are based on the experience of the authors and centre upon issues that commonly give rise to disputes. Each situation in practice will be different and may comprise several points commented upon.

If you have any doubt about the correct legal position you should seek further legal advice from Lawgistics or a suitably qualified solicitor. We cannot accept liability for your failure to take professional advice where it should reasonably be sought by a prudent person.

All characters are fictitious and should not be taken as referring to any person living or dead.

Use of this website shall be considered acceptance of the terms of the disclaimer presented above.

Let this be a warning to all car dealers wanting to do battle with certain finance companies where the claim amount is less than the £10,000 threshold for small claims court. It especially applies when the trader’s position is the issue complained of makes little or no difference, and thus, it does not render the car not of “satisfactory quality” or “fit for purpose”.

Part 27 of the Civil Procedure Rules governs most types of contractual disputes that are under £10,000 and thus fall within the small claims track. In essence, Part 27 states the general rule of the “winner pays the loser’s legal costs” does not apply to such claims. In other words, win or lose, you have to pay your own legal costs. However, there are several exemptions. One such exemption is when a party has behaved with conduct that is deemed unreasonable (a very high bar to succeed) and, as such, they should have to incur the other party’s legal costs.

A second exemption that often applies is when two businesses agree to a contract stating even if a court claim is below the £10,000 small claims limit, legal costs are nevertheless recoverable by the “winner” from the “loser”. This is particularly relevant when traders agree to a contract of business with a finance company and, sometimes, even a broker. You may not have even read or considered the implications of this contractual clause when you signed up several years ago, but the clause has big teeth and is ready to bite you on the bottom!

So, we have seen several cases where the finance company has succeeded in a claim for, say £2000, and then whips out that clause and receives another £4000 in legal costs awarded. Case law has made this possible and it is binding on the contracting parties. So, be warned! 

When we tell you to settle claims with finance companies because it is too financially risky to go to court, this particular exemption will often be the reason for our advice.

And for the avoidance of doubt, you simply cannot impose such a term when you sell a car to 86- year-old Mrs Jones – no matter how big you make it on your invoice and no matter how many times you ask her to sign under it!

ECSC Group plcMore Secure

On average 55 vulnerabilities are identified daily.

What can I do?

Review your organisations priorities and ask ‘can we afford a breach?’. What do I do during an incident? Who do I involve? When do I involve the ICO?

If you’re unable to answers these questions, you need help from the experts.

Jason WilliamsLegal AdvisorRead More by this author

Related Legal Updates

An eventful small claims hearing

Discover how a simple oversight in witness representation and off-screen coaching at a remote hearing can dramatically impact legal outcomes, underscoring the critical need for adherence to procedural rules and proper pre-action conduct in our latest insightful article.

From initial complaint to court claim form – let us help you

You can feel assured that court deadlines are attended to with the required attention and specialism.

Is it time to ditch “Dear Sirs”?

Clearly, “Dear Sirs” is old-fashioned, but is it sexist?

Location, Location, Mislocation: A costly oversight in court attendance

What the unfortunate Claimants (husband and wife) had not appreciated, was that the hearing was listed for the court at Central London.

Court re-instates a claim because of its own error!

One wonders how many times the courts have made the same error.

To Be or Not To Be Remains the Legal Question

The Claimant had sought to reject a commercial van that he had been using for business purposes but alleged that he was a consumer.

Always Deal with Court Documents

This cost our member an application fee to the court, plus a legal representative at court for the hearing.

Get in touch

Complete the form to get in touch or via our details below:

Phone
01480 455500
Address

Vinpenta House
High Causeway
Whittlesey
Peterborough
PE7 1AE

By submitting this quote you agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy & Cookies Policy.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.