Selling Cars that are unknowingly still on Finance

legal updates

You do a HPI check which comes back as clear of finance.

Read our disclaimer keyboard_arrow_down

This website content is intended as a general guide to law as it applies to the motor trade. Lawgistics has taken every effort to ensure that the contents are as accurate and up to date as at the date of first publication.

The laws and opinions expressed within this website may be varied as the law develops. As such we cannot accept liability for or the consequence of, any change of law, or official guidelines since publication or any misuse of the information provided.

The opinions in this website are based upon the experience of the authors and it must be recognised that only the courts and recognised tribunals can interpret the law with authority.

Examples given within the website are based on the experience of the authors and centre upon issues that commonly give rise to disputes. Each situation in practice will be different and may comprise several points commented upon.

If you have any doubt about the correct legal position you should seek further legal advice from Lawgistics or a suitably qualified solicitor. We cannot accept liability for your failure to take professional advice where it should reasonably be sought by a prudent person.

All characters are fictitious and should not be taken as referring to any person living or dead.

Use of this website shall be considered acceptance of the terms of the disclaimer presented above.

So, this is a scenario that has happened to several Lawgistics members recently.

You are a car dealer.  Someone comes in with a car they want to give in part exchange.  You do a HPI check which comes back as clear of finance.  You buy the car, advertise it and sell it to Joe Bloggs several months later.  At the point of re-sale, you again do a HPI check and again it comes back as clear.

Then, some-time later and out of the blue, you get a demand from the solicitors of a finance company saying that there is outstanding finance from 3 years previously and they want you to pay off that finance at, say, £20,000.  Investigations reveal that the finance company forgot to register the car with HPI as being on finance.  Where do you stand?

Surprisingly, you may not be on as secure grounding as you may assume. This is because of a – wait for it – 1975 House of Lords decision (Moorgate Mercantile Company Ltd v Twitchings) that held that the car dealer was still liable as there was no legal obligation on the finance company to register their interest with HPI.  This can leave a dealer highly exposed because as Joe Bloggs is an innocent first consumer purchaser of the car he DOES get good title (ownership) to it and of course you will never get a response from the seller who may have said it was free of finance.  Even if you did, the seller will simply remind you that you did a check and had satisfied yourself that it was not still on hire-purchase.

The additional obstacle is that this ruling was made by the House of Lords so it remains legally binding until legislation changes it, or another court of at least equal rank (The UK Supreme Court as it is known now) overturns it.  It is unfortunate how something that was perhaps in its comparative infancy over 40 years ago – but much more commonplace now – still protects the negligent finance company who fails to protect their own interests by what is now, a most universally accepted manner.

Profit BoxDevelop your people like your business depends on it

What most people don’t know is that talent development doesn’t have to be complicated, high risk or expensive. Once they integrate key development stages, the results can be remarkable. Empower your team. Lead your industry. We’re your strategic learning partner, driving performance by moving skills forward.

Jason WilliamsLegal AdvisorRead More by this author

Related Legal Updates

Work out if the correspondence received is credible…

Some of our members had received an identical email from a legal solutions firm about the possibility of losing their Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) licence.

Raising standards in all areas

The FCA is concerned that current financial services do not always work well for consumers and, in some instances, harm has been caused.

Mis-selling finance claims – Ignore at your peril!

Data subject access requests and various letters quoting CONC and the Consumer Credit Act are being received requesting lots of documentation to be provided.

Cost of living increase

With the increase in cost for just about everything, we anticipate that consumers will be feeling the squeeze and therefore, will either seek to reject vehicles or request for repairs to be undertaken.

Distance Selling Cancellation and Rejection – A Basic Legal Lesson for Finance Companies

The finance company who buy the car, are not consumers. The regulations do not apply to buyers, who purchase “in the course of trade or business.

Ambush! – Application to revisit determined arguments and introduce new claims refused

The judge merely allowed for fixed costs in accordance with the Small Claims Track cost regime

Opportunistic and misconceived claim for psychological harm struck out at a preliminary hearing

Consumer seeking to throw everything and the kitchen sink at our member in the vain hope that something might just stick

Get in touch

Complete the form to get in touch or via our details below:

01480 455500

Vinpenta House
High Causeway

By submitting this quote you agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy & Cookies Policy.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.