Road Traffic Offences- Failure to identify the driver

legal updates

it is important to get a clear record of who was driving when an offence is committed.

Read our disclaimer keyboard_arrow_down

This website content is intended as a general guide to law as it applies to the motor trade. Lawgistics has taken every effort to ensure that the contents are as accurate and up to date as at the date of first publication.

The laws and opinions expressed within this website may be varied as the law develops. As such we cannot accept liability for or the consequence of, any change of law, or official guidelines since publication or any misuse of the information provided.

The opinions in this website are based upon the experience of the authors and it must be recognised that only the courts and recognised tribunals can interpret the law with authority.

Examples given within the website are based on the experience of the authors and centre upon issues that commonly give rise to disputes. Each situation in practice will be different and may comprise several points commented upon.

If you have any doubt about the correct legal position you should seek further legal advice from Lawgistics or a suitably qualified solicitor. We cannot accept liability for your failure to take professional advice where it should reasonably be sought by a prudent person.

All characters are fictitious and should not be taken as referring to any person living or dead.

Use of this website shall be considered acceptance of the terms of the disclaimer presented above.

We periodically hear of clients finding problems when they cannot identify a driver of a vehicle who has committed an offence, usually speeding. 

It cannot be over emphasised that in cases where either employees drive company vehicles or customers take loan cars on test drives then it is important to get a clear record of who was driving when an offence is committed.

The law states that a keeper of a vehicle (as named on the V5) can avoid prosecution if:

a)    he/she did not know who the driver was and
b)    could not with reasonable diligence have ascertained who the driver was

If the keeper was a body corporate (eg a limited company) then the company must additionally show:

c)    no record was kept of persons who drove the vehicle and
d)    that failure to keep a record was reasonable

It is clear that you need to keep a record of drivers and you should make it a formal company instructions, with a warning of disciplinary action, if employees do not complete the detail, whether it be themselves driving or a customer on a test drive.  Make sure, you can provide a name and address.  Doing nothing can never be reasonable diligence.  Having set up a record system, check it periodically to make sure it’s working, and discipline anyone who is not following the rules.  It will be your head on the block should an offence be committed, and employees amnesia quickly kicks in if there’s a problem.

To satisfy c) and d) however, there must be a good reason why the actual driver is not recorded.  Reasons might be that an employee signs out for a vehicle but when approached, it transpires he let his/her spouse use the vehicle, and such use was never authorised.  Equally, if a vehicle is signed out for a test drive and the driver decides to let his ‘mate’ try it out.  There are many issues regarding test drives and we can provide test drive sheets if needed.

There is one further issue which can cause concern for company directors.  The law extends the same offence to a company director/manager/secretary or similar officer if the offence is proved to have been committed with their consent, connivance or neglect.  If such an offence is charged the person can be awarded penalty points if found guilty.  However, the burden of proof on the Police is much higher here since consent and connivance require the person to have knowledge of the offence and along with neglect show a dereliction of duty.  A failure to check records or have a system in place that will do so could lead to a charge being brought.

HaswentWebsites for dealers small and large

Composer is a next-gen automotive platform that has been designed from the ground up to give you an intuitive way to promote your stock. You have extensive stock management options, and you'll gain a brilliantly responsive new website to advertise your stock, starting at just £39.99/month.

Dennis ChapmanIn remembrance of Dennis Chapman 1951 -2015Read More by this author

Related Legal Updates

Customer reneges on agreed not distance sale

Our member explained they do not offer a delivery service and do not engage in distance selling.

Consumer “Handcuffed” by Deduction for Use Settlement

Don’t sign any contract unless you are fully aware of its terms!

Double or nothing – Consumer’s claim dismissed!

The Claimant countered with a request for more than double the amount that our member had offered.

Non-refundable deposits – Where do you stand?

Relevant paperwork should be provided before payment is taken.

Used car warranties – What are you liable for?

If a fault is found to have been developing at the time of sale, this could become the trader’s responsibility to provide a remedy.

Distance Selling Regulations – A thing of the past?

The regulations only apply to consumer contracts, not business-to-business sales, and only apply to sales conducted at a distance.

Accepting Lowball Offers 

What are your legal obligations when a customer makes a significantly low offer which you ”jokingly” accept? Will it be legally binding?

Get in touch

Complete the form to get in touch or via our details below:

01480 455500

Vinpenta House
High Causeway

By submitting this quote you agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy & Cookies Policy.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.