Repairs, it’s all about consent…


Do you have authorisation to repair?

Author: Stephanie Strachan
Reading time: 2 minutes

This article is 6 years old.

Read our disclaimer keyboard_arrow_down

This website content is intended as a general guide to law as it applies to the motor trade. Lawgistics has taken every effort to ensure that the contents are as accurate and up to date as at the date of first publication.

The laws and opinions expressed within this website may be varied as the law develops. As such we cannot accept liability for or the consequence of, any change of law, or official guidelines since publication or any misuse of the information provided.

The opinions in this website are based upon the experience of the authors and it must be recognised that only the courts and recognised tribunals can interpret the law with authority.

Examples given within the website are based on the experience of the authors and centre upon issues that commonly give rise to disputes. Each situation in practice will be different and may comprise several points commented upon.

If you have any doubt about the correct legal position you should seek further legal advice from Lawgistics or a suitably qualified solicitor. We cannot accept liability for your failure to take professional advice where it should reasonably be sought by a prudent person.

All characters are fictitious and should not be taken as referring to any person living or dead.

Use of this website shall be considered acceptance of the terms of the disclaimer presented above.

Here at Lawgistics we regularly have discussions with traders who casually say “It’s being repaired as we speak” Our reply is always “Do you have authorisation to repair?”

This problem arises when a vehicle has been sold to a consumer and it has experienced issues soon after purchase. Usually the consumer has returned the vehicle to the trader to look at and try and work out what is wrong. Some agree for the vehicle to be repaired and some do not.  We advise that you only start repairing consumers’ vehicles if they have expressly agreed for it to be repaired or if it can be implied they are agreeing for the vehicle to be repaired by returning it to you.

If a consumer expressly tells you “I am rejecting the vehicle” when it is returned to you for inspection then repairs should not be started. This can prove very troublesome if you start to repair and the consumer disagrees that you had authorisation. This could damage the success of the case in the future if it progressed. You could be deemed to have accepted the return of the vehicle, or even worse it could be considered as criminal damage.

Sometimes you have little choice to repair the vehicle whilst you are inspecting it, for example, you have stripped the gearbox or engine and identified a very quick, simple repair that is needed. It would be uneconomical to rebuild the engine or gearbox because of labour costs without doing the repair in cases such as these so we would argue that repair is the proportionate remedy. We have a range of other arguments that could be used in cases such as these so if you are in this situation phone us prior to carrying out any repair work to check we agree that you should start the work.

We offer stationary pads that can be of assistance in cases such as these so if this is of interest to you then please call us.

If you have inspected a vehicle and work has already been carried out and the consumer did not agree to it then let us know and we will see how we can help.

Stephanie Strachan

In remembrance of Stephanie Strachan 1990-2020

Read more by this author

Getting in touch

You can contact us via the form or you can call us on 01480 455500.