Reasonable Adjustments – protecting pay


Moved from an engineering role maintaining cash machines to a less skilled 'key runner' role.

Author: Kiril Moskovchuk
Reading time: 2 minutes

This article is 6 years old.

Read our disclaimer keyboard_arrow_down

This website content is intended as a general guide to law as it applies to the motor trade. Lawgistics has taken every effort to ensure that the contents are as accurate and up to date as at the date of first publication.

The laws and opinions expressed within this website may be varied as the law develops. As such we cannot accept liability for or the consequence of, any change of law, or official guidelines since publication or any misuse of the information provided.

The opinions in this website are based upon the experience of the authors and it must be recognised that only the courts and recognised tribunals can interpret the law with authority.

Examples given within the website are based on the experience of the authors and centre upon issues that commonly give rise to disputes. Each situation in practice will be different and may comprise several points commented upon.

If you have any doubt about the correct legal position you should seek further legal advice from Lawgistics or a suitably qualified solicitor. We cannot accept liability for your failure to take professional advice where it should reasonably be sought by a prudent person.

All characters are fictitious and should not be taken as referring to any person living or dead.

Use of this website shall be considered acceptance of the terms of the disclaimer presented above.

If a disabled employee is transferred to a role which would normally attract a lower pay, is the employer still obliged to maintain the higher level of pay which the employee was paid for the job such employee is no longer able to perform? In the recent case G4S Cash Solutions (UK) Ltd v Powell  the Employment Appeals Tribunal has answered in the affirmative.

In this case, the employee had been moved from an engineering role maintaining cash machines to a less skilled ‘key runner’ role. After initially having his pay protected, the employer proposed to cut the pay by around 10%. The employee refused to accept the pay cut and was dismissed. The Employment Tribunal found the dismissal to be discriminatory and unfair, and that the reasonable adjustments extended to maintaining the employee’s former pay in his new role.

At the appeal stage, the tribunal found no reason in principle why the duty to make reasonable adjustments would not extend to protecting the pay. Maintaining the pay level together with other measures is deemed to counter a disabled employee’s disadvantage. The objectives of the legislation plainly envisage an element of cost to the employer, and protection of the pay falls under this cost. The question is, however, if maintaining the level of pay is reasonable. As the proposed pay cut was 10%, the tribunals on the facts of this case took the view that this amount was reasonable for the employer to bear.

Kiril Moskovchuk

Legal Advisor

Read more by this author

Getting in touch

You can contact us via the form or you can call us on 01480 455500.