Proving the ‘chain of custody’ can be a challenge

legal updates

Conflicting interests on a used car can turn a simple purchase into a legal minefield. Here’s how to evidence the chain, challenge a finance claim, and spot the red flags before you hand over the cash.

Read our disclaimer keyboard_arrow_down

This website content is intended as a general guide to law as it applies to the motor trade. Lawgistics has taken every effort to ensure that the contents are as accurate and up to date as at the date of first publication.

The laws and opinions expressed within this website may be varied as the law develops. As such we cannot accept liability for or the consequence of, any change of law, or official guidelines since publication or any misuse of the information provided.

The opinions in this website are based upon the experience of the authors and it must be recognised that only the courts and recognised tribunals can interpret the law with authority.

Examples given within the website are based on the experience of the authors and centre upon issues that commonly give rise to disputes. Each situation in practice will be different and may comprise several points commented upon.

If you have any doubt about the correct legal position you should seek further legal advice from Lawgistics or a suitably qualified solicitor. We cannot accept liability for your failure to take professional advice where it should reasonably be sought by a prudent person.

All characters are fictitious and should not be taken as referring to any person living or dead.

Use of this website shall be considered acceptance of the terms of the disclaimer presented above.

This is especially true when determining conflicting interests in a car.

As most will know, ownership of a vehicle is usually determined not by the V5C logbook, but by who paid for it or to whom it was gifted.

However, if the vehicle is on finance, the lender owns it until the debt is fully paid. A notable exception applies where you buy from a private purchaser who has acquired good title, having bought in good faith without notice of the finance.

In such a scenario, the buyer then bears the burden of proof on these issues, because the presumption under s.21 of the Sale of Goods Act 1979 is that there is no transfer of title. So, if the buyer wants to contest the finance claim, they will need to track down the person who sold them the vehicle and find out as much as possible about how that sale came about, including: how the vehicle was marketed; who the seller was; what information they provided about the vehicle; the sale price; whether it was sold cheaply; what, if any, enquiries the seller made when they themselves bought it; and whether anything occurred during the sale that ought to have alerted the seller, acting in good faith, that something was amiss.

As the opening of ‘The Chain’ by Fleetwood Mac puts it, ‘Listen to the wind blow, watch the sun rise.’

Fleetwood Mac may not save you here, but asking the right questions of a private seller before you commit to buy just might. Combine those questions with the usual due diligence checks and online searches to guard against unforeseen third-party finance interests.

If you have run into a finance or title dispute, our Lawgistics legal team can help through our telephone helpline or casework service.

MotorDeskA car dealership management platform that combines all the tools your business needs into a single, unified and modern platform.

Available on all your devices via your web browser or the dedicated MotorDesk desktop and mobile apps.

Howard TilneyHead of Strategy / Legal AdvisorRead More by this author

Related Legal Updates

Motor Finance Consumer Redress Scheme

The FCA has launched a consultation on a motor finance redress scheme that could see average payouts of around £700 where key commission arrangements were not disclosed.

The FCA £1m Campaign: Better Late Than Never!

The FCA has launched a £1 million campaign to tell motor finance customers they can access compensation without claims firms or lawyers.

Motor Finance Commissions: Supreme Court Slashes £44 Billion Payout, but Are Dealers Really Off the Hook?

The Supreme Court’s August ruling wiped most of the eye-watering £44 billion redress bill off the table, yet thousands of drivers could still pocket compensation when the FCA unveils its new scheme next year. Here’s what the decision really means for lenders, dealers and consumers.

Undisclosed Motor Finance Commissions: Are We Finally Nearing the End?

After years of speculation, the FCA signals a possible redress scheme for motor finance commissions—just as the Supreme Court prepares to weigh in.

When principle costs you the case

What started as a bold claim ‘on principle’ quickly unravelled into a costly courtroom lesson in getting your facts, and your legal standing, straight.

Is the discretionary commission argument finally coming to an end?

Could this be the final chapter in the finance commission scandal that’s plagued the motor trade for years?

Honest guv, it was a mistake!

It is useful to know that if an employee has made a mistake, it is not that employee who is deemed liable.

Get in touch

Complete the form to get in touch or via our details below:

Phone
01480 455500
Address

Vinpenta House
High Causeway
Whittlesey
Peterborough
PE7 1AE

By submitting this quote you agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy & Cookies Policy.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.