PPI Complaints – a growing concern for businesses

legal updates

There is no point in shelving the enquiry and hoping it will go away.

Read our disclaimer keyboard_arrow_down

This website content is intended as a general guide to law as it applies to the motor trade. Lawgistics has taken every effort to ensure that the contents are as accurate and up to date as at the date of first publication.

The laws and opinions expressed within this website may be varied as the law develops. As such we cannot accept liability for or the consequence of, any change of law, or official guidelines since publication or any misuse of the information provided.

The opinions in this website are based upon the experience of the authors and it must be recognised that only the courts and recognised tribunals can interpret the law with authority.

Examples given within the website are based on the experience of the authors and centre upon issues that commonly give rise to disputes. Each situation in practice will be different and may comprise several points commented upon.

If you have any doubt about the correct legal position you should seek further legal advice from Lawgistics or a suitably qualified solicitor. We cannot accept liability for your failure to take professional advice where it should reasonably be sought by a prudent person.

All characters are fictitious and should not be taken as referring to any person living or dead.

Use of this website shall be considered acceptance of the terms of the disclaimer presented above.

We have seen increasing numbers of clients receiving enquiries from businesses set up to deal with insurance, principally PPI (Payment Protection Insurance). 

There is no point in shelving the enquiry and hoping it will go away. The first thing to do is to investigate the complaint and recover all the documentation relating to the finance arrangements.  This begs a further question since are you confident you have maintained all documentation?  It pays dividends at these times to not only have the standard ‘duty of care’, ‘demands and needs’ paperwork, but also copies of the advisory policy summaries issued by the finance companies.

If the consumer is not happy with the response they can proceed on to make a complaint to the Financial Ombudsman (FO) who will arrange for an adjudicator to deal with it.  Even if further consideration needs to be given to understand whether the FO can deal with it, a case fee becomes chargeable.  Currently a case fee is not chargeable for the first three cases but then a fee of £500 is charged.

The FO’s office may then request further information and will need a conclusion based on ‘the balance of probability’.

If the dispute still cannot be agreed then an ombudsman independently reviews the case.

A final decision, if the consumer accepts it, is binding. The ombudsman can direct the business pays amounts for financial loss and/or pain and suffering, damage to reputation and distress and inconvenience. The maximum award is £100,000.

DMS NavigatorDealer Management System software for Car Sales, Aftersales and eCommerce

Our dealers use us to help them be more Efficient and Profitable!

You can use our Dealer and Lead Management software to integrate all dealership departments, both online and physical ; providing all in-house functions; Invoicing, Stock Management, Accounting and Marketing as well as interfacing for advertising, ecommerce and more.

Dennis ChapmanIn remembrance of Dennis Chapman 1951 -2015Read More by this author

Related Legal Updates

Legal Disputes: Why traders should avoid direct contact

The urge to sort the matter out, or attempt to, can put a strain on the process and you may find yourself in a difficult position.

The etiquette of handling consumer complaints

It is always best practice to get involved while you have the chance and follow the correct process at the very beginning.

Double Finance Danger: Don’t get caught out!

Do not simply accept what the seller advises and drill down into any finance outstanding.

Implications, assumptions, and confusion – why being clear on your actions could be key to winning

The diagnosis showed the third-party garage had failed to repair the vehicle to a satisfactory standard and this was relayed to the consumer.

Burden of proof? Get your evidence while you can!

The burden of proof reverses for issues raised between 30 days and six months of ownership.

A New Case – What Do We Need From You?

You might be thinking, “Why do my thoughts and comments matter?”

Do I have to reply?

The lender writes to our member for assistance with paperwork, but our member decides to ignore it.

Get in touch

Complete the form to get in touch or via our details below:

Phone
01480 455500
Address

Vinpenta House
High Causeway
Whittlesey
Peterborough
PE7 1AE

By submitting this quote you agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy & Cookies Policy.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.