Author: Nicola Porter
Published: November 25, 2015
Reading time: 2 minutes
This article is 6 years old.
Read our disclaimer keyboard_arrow_down
This website content is intended as a general guide to law as it applies to the motor trade. Lawgistics has taken every effort to ensure that the contents are as accurate and up to date as at the date of first publication.
The laws and opinions expressed within this website may be varied as the law develops. As such we cannot accept liability for or the consequence of, any change of law, or official guidelines since publication or any misuse of the information provided.
The opinions in this website are based upon the experience of the authors and it must be recognised that only the courts and recognised tribunals can interpret the law with authority.
Examples given within the website are based on the experience of the authors and centre upon issues that commonly give rise to disputes. Each situation in practice will be different and may comprise several points commented upon.
If you have any doubt about the correct legal position you should seek further legal advice from Lawgistics or a suitably qualified solicitor. We cannot accept liability for your failure to take professional advice where it should reasonably be sought by a prudent person.
All characters are fictitious and should not be taken as referring to any person living or dead.
Use of this website shall be considered acceptance of the terms of the disclaimer presented above.
With Remembrance Day now behind us, it was interesting to see the number of news story which commented on who was, and who was not wearing a poppy, on TV.
It begs an interesting question in employment law, is it acceptable for employees to wear poppies or not? There has been case law previously about wearing political badges, or charity wristbands to show support for various causes, but the poppy has not, until recently been anything to question.
There was a story this year that an employee from a well known fast food establishment was banned by their employer from wearing a poppy whilst serving behind the counter. The company claimed that this was for health and safety reasons, but the employee argued that it was a political belief and therefore banning him from wearing the poppy was discriminatory. This belief was wholly unfounded and had the matter been escalated further then the employees case would likely have failed.
This doesn’t mean that a blanket ban, or forcing any employee to wear a poppy can be implemented by an employer, as this maybe discriminatory. As long as the employer has justifications for any refusal then there should not be an issue.