Obnoxious Trading Standards Officer won’t like this court decision!

legal updates

Regrettably, a significant minority like the power that they believe they have and start throwing it about somewhat recklessly.

Read our disclaimer keyboard_arrow_down

This website content is intended as a general guide to law as it applies to the motor trade. Lawgistics has taken every effort to ensure that the contents are as accurate and up to date as at the date of first publication.

The laws and opinions expressed within this website may be varied as the law develops. As such we cannot accept liability for or the consequence of, any change of law, or official guidelines since publication or any misuse of the information provided.

The opinions in this website are based upon the experience of the authors and it must be recognised that only the courts and recognised tribunals can interpret the law with authority.

Examples given within the website are based on the experience of the authors and centre upon issues that commonly give rise to disputes. Each situation in practice will be different and may comprise several points commented upon.

If you have any doubt about the correct legal position you should seek further legal advice from Lawgistics or a suitably qualified solicitor. We cannot accept liability for your failure to take professional advice where it should reasonably be sought by a prudent person.

All characters are fictitious and should not be taken as referring to any person living or dead.

Use of this website shall be considered acceptance of the terms of the disclaimer presented above.

For the most part, Trading Standards Officers do a good job in protecting the public and bringing the “bad boys” (and girls!) to task. 

Regrettably, a significant minority like the power that they believe they have and start throwing it about somewhat recklessly.

Take the officer from one Scottish Trading Standards who descended upon our clients’ business wholly uninvited.  The heinous crime seemingly committed by the garage was that they allegedly sold a car without their complainant being told that the car was once a “Cat C” and had been an insurance write off.  Our client showed them the advert on Auto Trader stating it to be so but the Officer was adamant that the consumer had not seen the advert and was not told it whilst at the garage.  Our client was equally as adamant that it was made clear to the intended buyer that this was the case, even pointing out the area that they believed had caused the vehicle to become a “CAT C” before proper repair.

I asked to speak to the Trading Standards Officer whose behaviour was aggressive and obnoxious.  She was going to ensure that this case was going to result in her legal dept referring it to the Procurator Fiscal (the equivalent of the Crown Prosecution Service) and that a successful prosecution was inevitable.  But it never was!

For some time later, our client received a letter from Trading Standards simply saying that THEY had determined that our client had committed an offence under the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008 – specifically a misleading omission and THEY were writing to give our client a caution for it!

Fuelled by this outcome, their complainant issued separate legal proceedings to reject the car on the grounds that it had been misrepresented/misdescribed by not mentioning the Category C recording.  A claim denied by our client.  At the Sheriff’s court the claim was DISMISSED entirely and indeed, under cross-examination by the Sheriff, the complainant had to admit that he was not even present at the material time and that the car had actually been sold to his parents who had visited the garage!  As the parents were not in court they were incapable of being challenged and upon considering all of the points brought before the court, the Sheriff stated that there was little choice other than to find in favour of our client.

HaswentWebsites for dealers small and large

Composer is a next-gen automotive platform that has been designed from the ground up to give you an intuitive way to promote your stock. You have extensive stock management options, and you'll gain a brilliantly responsive new website to advertise your stock, starting at just £39.99/month.

Jason WilliamsLegal AdvisorRead More by this author

Related Legal Updates

How would you like to pay: cash, card, or crypto?

Crypto is a virtually unregulated payment method and does not have any statutory backing, unlike the S75 Consumer Credit Act 1974. Consumers will be unable to request an “undo” on the transaction and rely entirely on the seller to willingly provide a refund.

Why bother with Pre-Delivery Inspection Forms (PDI)?

It is easy to go around a vehicle, giving everything a cursory glance and just ticking the boxes to say you have looked at it.

A reasonable price to be paid for a service

The defendant paid only a portion of the invoice, promising to pay the remainder in good time, and took the vehicle.

Can an entire family bring court proceedings for an alleged defective car?

Luckily the Ruffles’ family dog didn’t turn up either as no doubt Pooch would have been allowed a woof on the witness stand too!

Car Dealers and Consumers – A Modern Day Tale

Ambulance chasers and chancer consumers are two pet hates of the legal team and we relish dealing with their issues here at Lawgistics.

The real difference between claims under and over £10k

Litigation isn’t always just about having a strong argument, there are many factors that can help you win a case and reduce your risk.

Warranty or Statutory Rights

We all regularly hear comments that a warranty covers consumer rights and there is a cut off of those rights once the warranty expires.

Get in touch

Complete the form to get in touch or via our details below:

01480 455500

Vinpenta House
High Causeway

By submitting this quote you agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy & Cookies Policy.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.