Obnoxious Trading Standards Officer won’t like this court decision!

legal updates

Regrettably, a significant minority like the power that they believe they have and start throwing it about somewhat recklessly.

Read our disclaimer keyboard_arrow_down

This website content is intended as a general guide to law as it applies to the motor trade. Lawgistics has taken every effort to ensure that the contents are as accurate and up to date as at the date of first publication.

The laws and opinions expressed within this website may be varied as the law develops. As such we cannot accept liability for or the consequence of, any change of law, or official guidelines since publication or any misuse of the information provided.

The opinions in this website are based upon the experience of the authors and it must be recognised that only the courts and recognised tribunals can interpret the law with authority.

Examples given within the website are based on the experience of the authors and centre upon issues that commonly give rise to disputes. Each situation in practice will be different and may comprise several points commented upon.

If you have any doubt about the correct legal position you should seek further legal advice from Lawgistics or a suitably qualified solicitor. We cannot accept liability for your failure to take professional advice where it should reasonably be sought by a prudent person.

All characters are fictitious and should not be taken as referring to any person living or dead.

Use of this website shall be considered acceptance of the terms of the disclaimer presented above.

For the most part, Trading Standards Officers do a good job in protecting the public and bringing the “bad boys” (and girls!) to task. 

Regrettably, a significant minority like the power that they believe they have and start throwing it about somewhat recklessly.

Take the officer from one Scottish Trading Standards who descended upon our clients’ business wholly uninvited.  The heinous crime seemingly committed by the garage was that they allegedly sold a car without their complainant being told that the car was once a “Cat C” and had been an insurance write off.  Our client showed them the advert on Auto Trader stating it to be so but the Officer was adamant that the consumer had not seen the advert and was not told it whilst at the garage.  Our client was equally as adamant that it was made clear to the intended buyer that this was the case, even pointing out the area that they believed had caused the vehicle to become a “CAT C” before proper repair.

I asked to speak to the Trading Standards Officer whose behaviour was aggressive and obnoxious.  She was going to ensure that this case was going to result in her legal dept referring it to the Procurator Fiscal (the equivalent of the Crown Prosecution Service) and that a successful prosecution was inevitable.  But it never was!

For some time later, our client received a letter from Trading Standards simply saying that THEY had determined that our client had committed an offence under the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008 – specifically a misleading omission and THEY were writing to give our client a caution for it!

Fuelled by this outcome, their complainant issued separate legal proceedings to reject the car on the grounds that it had been misrepresented/misdescribed by not mentioning the Category C recording.  A claim denied by our client.  At the Sheriff’s court the claim was DISMISSED entirely and indeed, under cross-examination by the Sheriff, the complainant had to admit that he was not even present at the material time and that the car had actually been sold to his parents who had visited the garage!  As the parents were not in court they were incapable of being challenged and upon considering all of the points brought before the court, the Sheriff stated that there was little choice other than to find in favour of our client.

Wearewood Services LtdMotor Trade Web Specialists

We offer an all-encompassing web, digital & design service specially tailored to the Motor Industry.

Jason WilliamsLegal AdvisorRead More by this author

Related Legal Updates

The power of expert evidence in vehicle disputes

Our member never claimed the 5-year-old, multi-owner car was perfect.

Recent Cases, Real Consequences – and What to Learn

From missed emails to misplaced vehicles, here are a few real-world reminders to help you avoid unnecessary headaches.

Section 23 – Consumers Rights Act 2015 (CRA2015)

The judge determined our member was liable for the repair, despite the clear MOT and trouble-free driving over three months.

Trading Standards Prosecution of Car Dealers

Notify us of any contact you have with your local Trading Standards Officers at the earliest possible stage of their involvement.

Legal Disputes: Why traders should avoid direct contact

The urge to sort the matter out, or attempt to, can put a strain on the process and you may find yourself in a difficult position.

The etiquette of handling consumer complaints

It is always best practice to get involved while you have the chance and follow the correct process at the very beginning.

The customer isn’t always right…

As it was a defect he knew about, he cannot now claim it renders the vehicle not fit for purpose or not of satisfactory quality.

Get in touch

Complete the form to get in touch or via our details below:

Phone
01480 455500
Address

Vinpenta House
High Causeway
Whittlesey
Peterborough
PE7 1AE

By submitting this quote you agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy & Cookies Policy.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.