Author: Jason Williams
Published: November 24, 2016
Reading time: 1 minute
This article is 8 years old.
Read our disclaimer keyboard_arrow_down
This website content is intended as a general guide to law as it applies to the motor trade. Lawgistics has taken every effort to ensure that the contents are as accurate and up to date as at the date of first publication.
The laws and opinions expressed within this website may be varied as the law develops. As such we cannot accept liability for or the consequence of, any change of law, or official guidelines since publication or any misuse of the information provided.
The opinions in this website are based upon the experience of the authors and it must be recognised that only the courts and recognised tribunals can interpret the law with authority.
Examples given within the website are based on the experience of the authors and centre upon issues that commonly give rise to disputes. Each situation in practice will be different and may comprise several points commented upon.
If you have any doubt about the correct legal position you should seek further legal advice from Lawgistics or a suitably qualified solicitor. We cannot accept liability for your failure to take professional advice where it should reasonably be sought by a prudent person.
All characters are fictitious and should not be taken as referring to any person living or dead.
Use of this website shall be considered acceptance of the terms of the disclaimer presented above.
Court directions in the run up to a hearing are not to be ignored and if they are, cases can be struck out.
However, the leniency shown by one District Judge in favour of a consumer seems rather bizarre.
This is what happened:
a. Consumer’s Particulars of Claim so vague that our client had no specific detail to defend.
b. Parties ordered to send the court a Witness Statement by a certain date. Client did but consumer did not send one at all.
c. Consumer asked for the hearing to be moved by a week – granted.
d. Hearing day – consumer does not show up as still on holiday – but sends his mother instead!
e. Mother tries to give Judge a Witness Statement in the form of letter – signed by her on her son’s behalf!
Outcome: Telling off by the Judge to consumer’s mother – but case adjourned until next year! Our client left court still not knowing what he was attempting to defend!
