Motor Trade case law – Satisfactory quality

legal_updates

Goods are of satisfactory quality if they meet the standard that a reasonable person would regard as satisfactory

Author: Dennis Chapman
Published:
Reading time: 2 minutes

This article is 12 years old.

Read our disclaimer keyboard_arrow_down

This website content is intended as a general guide to law as it applies to the motor trade. Lawgistics has taken every effort to ensure that the contents are as accurate and up to date as at the date of first publication.

The laws and opinions expressed within this website may be varied as the law develops. As such we cannot accept liability for or the consequence of, any change of law, or official guidelines since publication or any misuse of the information provided.

The opinions in this website are based upon the experience of the authors and it must be recognised that only the courts and recognised tribunals can interpret the law with authority.

Examples given within the website are based on the experience of the authors and centre upon issues that commonly give rise to disputes. Each situation in practice will be different and may comprise several points commented upon.

If you have any doubt about the correct legal position you should seek further legal advice from Lawgistics or a suitably qualified solicitor. We cannot accept liability for your failure to take professional advice where it should reasonably be sought by a prudent person.

All characters are fictitious and should not be taken as referring to any person living or dead.

Use of this website shall be considered acceptance of the terms of the disclaimer presented above.

One of the biggest areas of enquiry to the Helpline is in relation to this chestnut of a question.  And the answer?  It depends…

Firstly what does the law say?

Goods are of satisfactory quality if they meet the standard that a reasonable person would regard as satisfactory taking account of any description of the goods, the price (if relevant) and all the other relevant circumstances.

So what could a reasonable person think?  In the case of Bramhill v Edwards 2004 a company sold a motor home 102 inches wide when the legal maximum in the UK was 100 inches. However, at the time many ‘illegal’ vehicles were sold and the authorities turned a blind eye.  The Court held that in these circumstances, as reasonable users of motor caravans knew of this issue then the vehicle was of satisfactory quality.

Additionally in the legislation ‘quality’ is taken to be:

a) fitness for all the purposes for which goods of the kind in question are commonly supplied. 

So if you sell a car which is only suitable for banger racing then unless the customer has agreed this it would not be of satisfactory quality.

b) Appearance and finish

c) Freedom from minor defects

This can lead to problems, since when is a defect not a defect?  A characteristic road noise, a small rattle on the gear lever, a smell etc, etc.  In many cases these are part and parcel of the second hand vehicle.

d) Safety

As we always say, a MOT pass is a valuable piece of evidence to show there is a particular level of safety at the time of sale.

e) Durability

If something drops off the car soon after sale it would not satisfy the measure of durability.  It has to last a ‘reasonable’ time.

In future legal updates we will demonstrate how particular cases have given some precedent to these aspects of the law.

Dennis Chapman

In remembrance of Dennis Chapman 1951 -2015

Read more by this author

Getting in touch

You can contact us via the form or you can call us on 01480 455500.