Location, Location, Mislocation: A costly oversight in court attendance

legal updates

What the unfortunate Claimants (husband and wife) had not appreciated, was that the hearing was listed for the court at Central London.

Read our disclaimer keyboard_arrow_down

This website content is intended as a general guide to law as it applies to the motor trade. Lawgistics has taken every effort to ensure that the contents are as accurate and up to date as at the date of first publication.

The laws and opinions expressed within this website may be varied as the law develops. As such we cannot accept liability for or the consequence of, any change of law, or official guidelines since publication or any misuse of the information provided.

The opinions in this website are based upon the experience of the authors and it must be recognised that only the courts and recognised tribunals can interpret the law with authority.

Examples given within the website are based on the experience of the authors and centre upon issues that commonly give rise to disputes. Each situation in practice will be different and may comprise several points commented upon.

If you have any doubt about the correct legal position you should seek further legal advice from Lawgistics or a suitably qualified solicitor. We cannot accept liability for your failure to take professional advice where it should reasonably be sought by a prudent person.

All characters are fictitious and should not be taken as referring to any person living or dead.

Use of this website shall be considered acceptance of the terms of the disclaimer presented above.

“Read the court order most carefully” will doubtless be inscribed on my tombstone.  Probably after having been killed due to reading court directions and forgetting that I had stepped onto the road – but that is a story for my remaining colleagues to muse over.

However, Chelmsford County Court sent out an order telling the parties to turn up at 11.00 on a certain date. What the unfortunate Claimants (husband and wife) had not appreciated, was that the hearing was listed for the court at Central London.

By the time they had realised, it was too late, and only our member and his advocate appeared. 

The Claim was dismissed.

The Claimants sought to set it aside – paid £285 – and included a witness statement from a parent who had their children dropped off in readiness, to show how prepared they were. Shame they hadn’t realised that they were heading for the wrong location altogether. 

Their set aside application was not permitted. The judge wasn’t hugely interested in the reason for their “no-show”. He decided the defence was strong, the claim had no merit, and was not justified to have even more court time allocated to it. 

An expensive lesson to learn.

The defence was drafted by Lawgistics Litigation for the Motor Trade and the advocate was from LPC Law.

WeRecruit Auto LtdPermanent Automotive Recruitment from an experienced and trustworthy recruitment partner.

We cover roles within all departments and sectors of the Automotive industry, and are here to listen to your specific needs and find the most suitable candidates to fit your business.

Jason WilliamsLegal AdvisorRead More by this author

Related Legal Updates

From initial complaint to court claim form – let us help you

You can feel assured that court deadlines are attended to with the required attention and specialism.

Is it time to ditch “Dear Sirs”?

Clearly, “Dear Sirs” is old-fashioned, but is it sexist?

Court re-instates a claim because of its own error!

One wonders how many times the courts have made the same error.

To Be or Not To Be Remains the Legal Question

The Claimant had sought to reject a commercial van that he had been using for business purposes but alleged that he was a consumer.

Always Deal with Court Documents

This cost our member an application fee to the court, plus a legal representative at court for the hearing.

Warning to all! You must follow the orders of the court!

Had the consumer been reasonable, this issue could have been resolved without going to court.

Claim struck out for non-attendance

A twelve year old van, had been sold to a business without a warranty and more than 130,000 miles on the clock.

Get in touch

Complete the form to get in touch or via our details below:

Phone
01480 455500
Address

Vinpenta House
High Causeway
Whittlesey
Peterborough
PE7 1AE

By submitting this quote you agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy & Cookies Policy.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.