Location, Location, Location? More like, Vacated, Vacated, Vacated!

legal updates

Such regular cancellations are unacceptable given that once the Claimant pays a hearing fee to the court, it is not reimbursed even if the hearing date is cancelled by the court.

Read our disclaimer keyboard_arrow_down

This website content is intended as a general guide to law as it applies to the motor trade. Lawgistics has taken every effort to ensure that the contents are as accurate and up to date as at the date of first publication.

The laws and opinions expressed within this website may be varied as the law develops. As such we cannot accept liability for or the consequence of, any change of law, or official guidelines since publication or any misuse of the information provided.

The opinions in this website are based upon the experience of the authors and it must be recognised that only the courts and recognised tribunals can interpret the law with authority.

Examples given within the website are based on the experience of the authors and centre upon issues that commonly give rise to disputes. Each situation in practice will be different and may comprise several points commented upon.

If you have any doubt about the correct legal position you should seek further legal advice from Lawgistics or a suitably qualified solicitor. We cannot accept liability for your failure to take professional advice where it should reasonably be sought by a prudent person.

All characters are fictitious and should not be taken as referring to any person living or dead.

Use of this website shall be considered acceptance of the terms of the disclaimer presented above.

Is the County Court system falling apart?

We reported earlier this year that from beginning to end, the average time taken for a small claim to be concluded in court is one year or thereabouts. Throw in a Claimant who doesn’t comply with court orders – the consumer almost always gets a second chance – a bout of COVID, or even a train strike or two, and the hearing dates can get pushed further and further away. 

In just the last week, we know of FIVE of our clients who had their long-awaited day in court vacated, in other words, cancelled, with just a day or two of notice. The reason given? “Lack of judicial availability.” In layman’s terms, “We ain’t got a judge!” The Kent based courts appear to be particularly affected.

Such regular cancellations are unacceptable given that once the Claimant pays a hearing fee to the court, it is not reimbursed even if the hearing date is cancelled by the court. What other service provider could get away with that? 

It also has to be appreciated that parties have made sacrifices to accommodate such hearings and often will have paid for legal assistance, hotels, transport, etc. incurring financial losses that cannot always be recovered. And when a new date is given for the hearing, if either party cannot make it – what do they have to do? Make an application to the court and pay a couple of hundred quid for the court to decide whether the hearing date can be moved again. 

To be fair, the courts always encourage settlement. So, the way to do this is to make the Claimant pay loads of money, then cancel the hearings, give the parties a second hearing date for six months in the future, and hopefully the parties will settle, purely for the sake of their sanity. And the court gets to keep the hearing fee for doing nothing. With all that cash rolling in, you’d think they’d be able to hire a few more judges! The writer is available, Mr Lord Chancellor!

One of our clients feels particularly aggrieved, as their hearing was cancelled the day before, due to a lack of judicial availability. The date of the now vacated hearing was set in… October 2021!

And whilst this article is written with tongue partly implanted in cheek, the message to clients is to settle a dispute if it is at all possible to do so. Because while “dragging it out” might seem attractive, it is worthwhile mentioning the statute book contains legislation, written in the 1980s, that provides for interest on judgments to be awarded at 8% per annum. Vacated hearings can thus be even more expensive than losing to a Defendant, purely due to the court system not being fit for purpose.

We wait to see how many clients will get their court hearings cancelled this week. Well, we do have a bank holiday coming up soon after all…


Need help with keeping on track with FCA Regulation and Compliance? Partner with Automotive Compliance

Jason WilliamsLegal AdvisorRead More by this author

Related Legal Updates

Disclosure: Be transparent with your company details

The requirements are stipulated in the Company, Limited Liability Partnership and Business (Names and Trading Disclosures) Regulations 2015.

From initial complaint to court claim form – let us help you

You can feel assured that court deadlines are attended to with the required attention and specialism.

Is it time to ditch “Dear Sirs”?

Clearly, “Dear Sirs” is old-fashioned, but is it sexist?

Location, Location, Mislocation: A costly oversight in court attendance

What the unfortunate Claimants (husband and wife) had not appreciated, was that the hearing was listed for the court at Central London.

Court re-instates a claim because of its own error!

One wonders how many times the courts have made the same error.

Maintaining professionalism in customer disputes

Your emails may be presented to a judge for review to help decide on how you have handled the matter before the court’s involvement.

Lawgistics review WarrantyFirst Car Warranty Policies

We continue our journey reviewing aftermarket warranties and our next stop, WarrantyFirst.

Get in touch

Complete the form to get in touch or via our details below:

01480 455500

Vinpenta House
High Causeway

By submitting this quote you agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy & Cookies Policy.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.