Location, Location, Location? More like, Vacated, Vacated, Vacated!

legal updates

Such regular cancellations are unacceptable given that once the Claimant pays a hearing fee to the court, it is not reimbursed even if the hearing date is cancelled by the court.

Read our disclaimer keyboard_arrow_down

This website content is intended as a general guide to law as it applies to the motor trade. Lawgistics has taken every effort to ensure that the contents are as accurate and up to date as at the date of first publication.

The laws and opinions expressed within this website may be varied as the law develops. As such we cannot accept liability for or the consequence of, any change of law, or official guidelines since publication or any misuse of the information provided.

The opinions in this website are based upon the experience of the authors and it must be recognised that only the courts and recognised tribunals can interpret the law with authority.

Examples given within the website are based on the experience of the authors and centre upon issues that commonly give rise to disputes. Each situation in practice will be different and may comprise several points commented upon.

If you have any doubt about the correct legal position you should seek further legal advice from Lawgistics or a suitably qualified solicitor. We cannot accept liability for your failure to take professional advice where it should reasonably be sought by a prudent person.

All characters are fictitious and should not be taken as referring to any person living or dead.

Use of this website shall be considered acceptance of the terms of the disclaimer presented above.

Is the County Court system falling apart?

We reported earlier this year that from beginning to end, the average time taken for a small claim to be concluded in court is one year or thereabouts. Throw in a Claimant who doesn’t comply with court orders – the consumer almost always gets a second chance – a bout of COVID, or even a train strike or two, and the hearing dates can get pushed further and further away. 

In just the last week, we know of FIVE of our clients who had their long-awaited day in court vacated, in other words, cancelled, with just a day or two of notice. The reason given? “Lack of judicial availability.” In layman’s terms, “We ain’t got a judge!” The Kent based courts appear to be particularly affected.

Such regular cancellations are unacceptable given that once the Claimant pays a hearing fee to the court, it is not reimbursed even if the hearing date is cancelled by the court. What other service provider could get away with that? 

It also has to be appreciated that parties have made sacrifices to accommodate such hearings and often will have paid for legal assistance, hotels, transport, etc. incurring financial losses that cannot always be recovered. And when a new date is given for the hearing, if either party cannot make it – what do they have to do? Make an application to the court and pay a couple of hundred quid for the court to decide whether the hearing date can be moved again. 

To be fair, the courts always encourage settlement. So, the way to do this is to make the Claimant pay loads of money, then cancel the hearings, give the parties a second hearing date for six months in the future, and hopefully the parties will settle, purely for the sake of their sanity. And the court gets to keep the hearing fee for doing nothing. With all that cash rolling in, you’d think they’d be able to hire a few more judges! The writer is available, Mr Lord Chancellor!

One of our clients feels particularly aggrieved, as their hearing was cancelled the day before, due to a lack of judicial availability. The date of the now vacated hearing was set in… October 2021!

And whilst this article is written with tongue partly implanted in cheek, the message to clients is to settle a dispute if it is at all possible to do so. Because while “dragging it out” might seem attractive, it is worthwhile mentioning the statute book contains legislation, written in the 1980s, that provides for interest on judgments to be awarded at 8% per annum. Vacated hearings can thus be even more expensive than losing to a Defendant, purely due to the court system not being fit for purpose.

We wait to see how many clients will get their court hearings cancelled this week. Well, we do have a bank holiday coming up soon after all…

Brave AgencyDriving growth in the automotive industry

Brave is an award-winning digital agency offering a comprehensive range of services aimed at helping your business grow. From rebrands and web development to marketing campaigns that get you noticed, we do it all. Since 2000, we’ve helped businesses across the automotive sector reach new heights. Could yours be next?

Jason WilliamsLegal AdvisorRead More by this author

Related Legal Updates

What are you signing up for?

Long story short, you should carefully read any T&Cs provided to you and seek to ensure you understand any implications that your agreement may impose on you in the future.

Lawgistics review WSG warranty offering

As with most of the warranties we have reviewed, WSG’s options are limited in going above and beyond a consumer’s statutory rights and also limit claims in other areas that would ordinarily be covered.

Be careful of what you promise

Estoppel by representation is a rule that prevents someone from denying a set of facts or a statement that they previously represented as being true.

Disclose or not to disclose, that is the question

It is imperative that you know what is required to be disclosed, when to disclose the documents, and what your legal duty is both before proceedings and when a claim is issued.

Court Rules Against ‘Serial Returner’ in Distance Selling Dispute

It is clear from his evidence that his true intention was that he wanted the ability to reject the car at a time of his choosing.

Indemnities – Handle with Care!

Indemnity clauses are usually onerous by design and drafted in broad terms so dealers should not make the mistake of overlooking them.

Detailed records avoid post-sale issues

The Claimant was only entitled to compensation for the cost of repairs to the locks, which were considered likely to have been faulty at the point of sale and was awarded £385.

Get in touch

Complete the form to get in touch or via our details below:

Phone
01480 455500
Address

Vinpenta House
High Causeway
Whittlesey
Peterborough
PE7 1AE

By submitting this quote you agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy & Cookies Policy.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.