Lemons that don’t leave a bitter taste

legal updates

In the wake of the recent Ryder Cup, I looked to see how those across the pond give rights to buyers whilst balancing it against protecting decent car traders against “rogue” consumers.

Read our disclaimer keyboard_arrow_down

This website content is intended as a general guide to law as it applies to the motor trade. Lawgistics has taken every effort to ensure that the contents are as accurate and up to date as at the date of first publication.

The laws and opinions expressed within this website may be varied as the law develops. As such we cannot accept liability for or the consequence of, any change of law, or official guidelines since publication or any misuse of the information provided.

The opinions in this website are based upon the experience of the authors and it must be recognised that only the courts and recognised tribunals can interpret the law with authority.

Examples given within the website are based on the experience of the authors and centre upon issues that commonly give rise to disputes. Each situation in practice will be different and may comprise several points commented upon.

If you have any doubt about the correct legal position you should seek further legal advice from Lawgistics or a suitably qualified solicitor. We cannot accept liability for your failure to take professional advice where it should reasonably be sought by a prudent person.

All characters are fictitious and should not be taken as referring to any person living or dead.

Use of this website shall be considered acceptance of the terms of the disclaimer presented above.

The UK law on what a consumer’s rights are when they buy second hand vehicles is the subject of much debate and, even more, misinterpretation of those laws.  After all, aren’t we all perceived to be a “reasonable” person?  Seemingly, anything with wheels has to last pretty much forever regardless of price. Well, that’s what the consumers are, invariably, brainwashed into believing.

In the wake of the recent Ryder Cup, I looked to see how those across the pond give rights to buyers whilst balancing it against protecting decent car traders against “rogue” consumers.  I think they have done so much better than in the UK.

A material difference relates to the issue of warranties.  UK consumers rely on the warranty when it suits them and then tell you that they are useless when they feed you some drivel about how, under the Sale of Goods Act, any imperfection within the first six months allows them to get all of their money back.  Moreover, they can lie and tell you that they are themselves a car trader and accept a car with known problems, yet tell you subsequently that you must still fix anything and everything otherwise you are “restricting [their] rights as consumers”.

By comparison I shall leave you to consider how America’s car (automobile!) dealers are better protected than you, their UK based counterparts.  I will tell no lies, it is a straight “copy and paste” from Wikipedia.

“Lemon Laws are American State Laws that provide remedies for purchasers of cars and other consumer goods in order to compensate for products that repeatedly fail to meet standards of quality and performance.” 

“At the core of most lemon laws is the manufacturer’s breach of warranty. A manufacturer’s warranty is what makes the manufacturer legally responsible for repairs to the consumer’s vehicle or goods. It is a form of guarantee. An express warranty is typically a written warranty. An implied warranty unlike an express warranty is not written. The law imposes these obligations on the manufacturer, the seller or both as a matter of public policy. These vary from state to state.”

Although each state imposes different requirements for their own consumer lemon laws, a basic condition common to virtually all jurisdictions is that in order for the lemon law to apply, the automobile or product must have been purchased with a warranty. Products purchased on an “as is” or “with all faults” basis are typically not covered by state or federal lemon laws.”

ECSC Group plcMore Secure

On average 55 vulnerabilities are identified daily.

What can I do?

Review your organisations priorities and ask ‘can we afford a breach?’. What do I do during an incident? Who do I involve? When do I involve the ICO?

If you’re unable to answers these questions, you need help from the experts.

Jason WilliamsLegal AdvisorRead More by this author

Related Legal Updates

Implications, assumptions, and confusion – why being clear on your actions could be key to winning

The diagnosis showed the third-party garage had failed to repair the vehicle to a satisfactory standard and this was relayed to the consumer.

Burden of proof? Get your evidence while you can!

The burden of proof reverses for issues raised between 30 days and six months of ownership.

Claim Dismissed: No Proof of Fault at Purchase

Our member argued that numerous issues could have caused the overheating and ultimate failure.

Court Rules Against ‘Serial Returner’ in Distance Selling Dispute

It is clear from his evidence that his true intention was that he wanted the ability to reject the car at a time of his choosing.

The omni-channel approach and distance sales

The conclusion of a contract when purchasing a vehicle occurs when a deposit or the full purchase price is paid.

A New Case – What Do We Need From You?

You might be thinking, “Why do my thoughts and comments matter?”

Always prep, check, then check again

If you state that every vehicle comes with a new MOT, then ensure that they do!

Get in touch

Complete the form to get in touch or via our details below:

Phone
01480 455500
Address

Vinpenta House
High Causeway
Whittlesey
Peterborough
PE7 1AE

By submitting this quote you agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy & Cookies Policy.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.