Author: Dennis Chapman
Published: January 8, 2015
Reading time: 2 minutes
This article is 7 years old.
Read our disclaimer keyboard_arrow_down
This website content is intended as a general guide to law as it applies to the motor trade. Lawgistics has taken every effort to ensure that the contents are as accurate and up to date as at the date of first publication.
The laws and opinions expressed within this website may be varied as the law develops. As such we cannot accept liability for or the consequence of, any change of law, or official guidelines since publication or any misuse of the information provided.
The opinions in this website are based upon the experience of the authors and it must be recognised that only the courts and recognised tribunals can interpret the law with authority.
Examples given within the website are based on the experience of the authors and centre upon issues that commonly give rise to disputes. Each situation in practice will be different and may comprise several points commented upon.
If you have any doubt about the correct legal position you should seek further legal advice from Lawgistics or a suitably qualified solicitor. We cannot accept liability for your failure to take professional advice where it should reasonably be sought by a prudent person.
All characters are fictitious and should not be taken as referring to any person living or dead.
Use of this website shall be considered acceptance of the terms of the disclaimer presented above.
If a consumer reports faults with a car within six months of sale then the onus is upon the dealer to prove that the faults were not present at the point of sale, otherwise the dealer will be deemed responsible for them.
Unless the dealer already has such proof then it is usually essential for him to undertake a suitable inspection of the car as soon as possible and certainly before any remedial works are carried out, in an attempt to identify the alleged faults and establish whether or not they would have been present at the point of sale.
Early inspection facilities afford an opportunity to obtain evidence, which should allow the dealer to make an informed decision in respect of a consumer claim.
Depending upon the value of the car/alleged faults and/or the complexity of the issues raised, it is often advisable, particularly if Court proceedings are anticipated, for a dealer to consider commissioning a report from an independent consultant motor engineer.
It is imperative that such evidence is truly independent and complies with Part 35 of the Civil Procedure Rules.
Good expert evidence will often make the difference between success and failure before the Courts.
Should you have any queries or concerns in relation to inspection and expert evidence then please do not hesitate to contact our legal team for further advice.