Author: Dennis Chapman
Published: October 25, 2012
Reading time: 1 minute
This article is 9 years old.
Read our disclaimer keyboard_arrow_down
This website content is intended as a general guide to law as it applies to the motor trade. Lawgistics has taken every effort to ensure that the contents are as accurate and up to date as at the date of first publication.
The laws and opinions expressed within this website may be varied as the law develops. As such we cannot accept liability for or the consequence of, any change of law, or official guidelines since publication or any misuse of the information provided.
The opinions in this website are based upon the experience of the authors and it must be recognised that only the courts and recognised tribunals can interpret the law with authority.
Examples given within the website are based on the experience of the authors and centre upon issues that commonly give rise to disputes. Each situation in practice will be different and may comprise several points commented upon.
If you have any doubt about the correct legal position you should seek further legal advice from Lawgistics or a suitably qualified solicitor. We cannot accept liability for your failure to take professional advice where it should reasonably be sought by a prudent person.
All characters are fictitious and should not be taken as referring to any person living or dead.
Use of this website shall be considered acceptance of the terms of the disclaimer presented above.
Such discussions are normally saved for when there is a dispute with an employee or you are discussing the particulars of an employee’s departure. Labelling them as ‘Without Prejudice’ should allow for such conversations to be banned from being relied upon at a Tribunal. However is it really that simple?
The ‘Without Prejudice’ rule applies to statements both oral and written used in a genuine attempt to settle a dispute or departure of an employee.
Both parties must agree and understand the implications of using without prejudice, otherwise it will not be valid. Employers cannot simply say that a conversation is without prejudice, they must ask for the employees consent before the discussions can become binding in this manner.
Further the rule should not be abused, and used as a tool to cover up pressuring discussions that could aid a parties case in a hearing situation. Therefore the parties should look as to whether a situation warrants without prejudice or not.