Author: Philip Strickland
Published: July 1, 2018
Reading time: 2 minutes
This article is 3 years old.
Read our disclaimer keyboard_arrow_down
This website content is intended as a general guide to law as it applies to the motor trade. Lawgistics has taken every effort to ensure that the contents are as accurate and up to date as at the date of first publication.
The laws and opinions expressed within this website may be varied as the law develops. As such we cannot accept liability for or the consequence of, any change of law, or official guidelines since publication or any misuse of the information provided.
The opinions in this website are based upon the experience of the authors and it must be recognised that only the courts and recognised tribunals can interpret the law with authority.
Examples given within the website are based on the experience of the authors and centre upon issues that commonly give rise to disputes. Each situation in practice will be different and may comprise several points commented upon.
If you have any doubt about the correct legal position you should seek further legal advice from Lawgistics or a suitably qualified solicitor. We cannot accept liability for your failure to take professional advice where it should reasonably be sought by a prudent person.
All characters are fictitious and should not be taken as referring to any person living or dead.
Use of this website shall be considered acceptance of the terms of the disclaimer presented above.
From the beginning motoring was dominated by the engineer, the coachbuilder and the chauffer. Fuel came from chemists in cans. Journeys rarely exceeded a few miles, while a motorist frequently (and gratefully) ended his journey being pulled to the nearest Inn by a plough-horse. Coachwork was mostly open; there was no thought of vehicle theft.
We recently were asked to advise a client where they had attended a customer who had locked himself out of his car. All efforts to conventionally gain access failed. The customer was desperate and sanctioned any means to enter the car and start it. Eventually he agreed to the breaking of a window, having been told of the likely cost and this was done. After starting the car by bridging the circuit, the customer drove off in his now somewhat draughty car. Before he left he ordered a replacement window.
The driver was never seen again. Instead a different and rather irate customer appeared at the garage demanding to know why they helped a thief steal his car from outside his home!
The lesson here is that a stranded motorist should always be asked to provide his credentials, even in a stressful situation. They should be photographed, recorded and made to sign for the voluntary damage. The complainant too should be checked. It might have been a joint enterprise to extort damages.
Sadly, this horsing around cost our Clients rather more than a Pony!