Happy Birthday Consumer Rights Act

legal updates

Dealers must remember that not all faults are equal when deciding how to work with a customer who has reported a fault.

Read our disclaimer keyboard_arrow_down

This website content is intended as a general guide to law as it applies to the motor trade. Lawgistics has taken every effort to ensure that the contents are as accurate and up to date as at the date of first publication.

The laws and opinions expressed within this website may be varied as the law develops. As such we cannot accept liability for or the consequence of, any change of law, or official guidelines since publication or any misuse of the information provided.

The opinions in this website are based upon the experience of the authors and it must be recognised that only the courts and recognised tribunals can interpret the law with authority.

Examples given within the website are based on the experience of the authors and centre upon issues that commonly give rise to disputes. Each situation in practice will be different and may comprise several points commented upon.

If you have any doubt about the correct legal position you should seek further legal advice from Lawgistics or a suitably qualified solicitor. We cannot accept liability for your failure to take professional advice where it should reasonably be sought by a prudent person.

All characters are fictitious and should not be taken as referring to any person living or dead.

Use of this website shall be considered acceptance of the terms of the disclaimer presented above.

In our experience, the CRA has worked quite well for car dealers despite anomalies such as the ‘one repair rule’. 

This one repair rule is fine for less complex items but for modern day used cars, it is really not fit for purpose as sometimes we need to complete repairs by process of elimination and sometimes, two things will go wrong in relatively quick succession for no particular reason.

However, dealers must remember that not all faults are equal when deciding how to work with a customer who has reported a fault.

Firstly, if the report is reported in the first 30 days, this does not automatically mean that the customer can get a refund. For the customer to be eligible for a refund, the customer has to:

1.    Prove there is a fault;
2.    Prove the fault was there at the point of sale, and
3.    Prove the fault is ‘worthy’ of a refund.

In terms of worthiness, a new coil pack is unlikely to make a £5000 used car worthy of a refund as it’s a relatively quick and relatively easy fix. However, if the gearbox failed as they drove off the forecourt, then yes the customer is probably entitled to their money back although there is nothing wrong with offering a repair.

After 30 days, similar common sense should apply and so if the coil pack has been changed but a warning light comes up to suggest a tyre new sensor is required, this will not entitle the customer to a refund under the ‘one repair rule’ as a sensor does not make that £5000 used car not of satisfactory quality or not fit for purpose – it is just a minor fault.  

Customers, spurred on by headline advice which bypasses the crucial nuances of the law, can get carried away and start demanding all sorts. If you have any doubts about your rights when dealing with a tricky customer, Lawgistics Members do have the benefit of the Legal Helpline and can call and talk to our Consumer Rights experts to check their position.  

DMS NavigatorDealer Management System software for Car Sales, Aftersales and eCommerce

Our dealers use us to help them be more Efficient and Profitable!

You can use our Dealer and Lead Management software to integrate all dealership departments, both online and physical ; providing all in-house functions; Invoicing, Stock Management, Accounting and Marketing as well as interfacing for advertising, ecommerce and more.

Nona BowkisHead of Legal Services / SolicitorRead More by this author

Related Legal Updates

Legal Disputes: Why traders should avoid direct contact

The urge to sort the matter out, or attempt to, can put a strain on the process and you may find yourself in a difficult position.

The etiquette of handling consumer complaints

It is always best practice to get involved while you have the chance and follow the correct process at the very beginning.

A settlement agreement may not protect you

An agreement does not need to be in writing to be binding, but it is much easier to prove the terms of an agreement if there is a documented paper trail.

The customer isn’t always right…

As it was a defect he knew about, he cannot now claim it renders the vehicle not fit for purpose or not of satisfactory quality.

Implications, assumptions, and confusion – why being clear on your actions could be key to winning

The diagnosis showed the third-party garage had failed to repair the vehicle to a satisfactory standard and this was relayed to the consumer.

Burden of proof? Get your evidence while you can!

The burden of proof reverses for issues raised between 30 days and six months of ownership.

On your Marks… Get Set… Doh!

The TSO told our member that the consumer ought not to have experienced a failure given the age and mileage of the car.

Get in touch

Complete the form to get in touch or via our details below:

Phone
01480 455500
Address

Vinpenta House
High Causeway
Whittlesey
Peterborough
PE7 1AE

By submitting this quote you agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy & Cookies Policy.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.