Good preparation is key to winning in court

legal updates

Cases can be won or lost on how well the case is presented.

Read our disclaimer keyboard_arrow_down

This website content is intended as a general guide to law as it applies to the motor trade. Lawgistics has taken every effort to ensure that the contents are as accurate and up to date as at the date of first publication.

The laws and opinions expressed within this website may be varied as the law develops. As such we cannot accept liability for or the consequence of, any change of law, or official guidelines since publication or any misuse of the information provided.

The opinions in this website are based upon the experience of the authors and it must be recognised that only the courts and recognised tribunals can interpret the law with authority.

Examples given within the website are based on the experience of the authors and centre upon issues that commonly give rise to disputes. Each situation in practice will be different and may comprise several points commented upon.

If you have any doubt about the correct legal position you should seek further legal advice from Lawgistics or a suitably qualified solicitor. We cannot accept liability for your failure to take professional advice where it should reasonably be sought by a prudent person.

All characters are fictitious and should not be taken as referring to any person living or dead.

Use of this website shall be considered acceptance of the terms of the disclaimer presented above.

As soon as a customer issues a court claim against you, you should seek legal advice.

Cases can be won or lost on how well the case is presented and it is important to have a plan from the start. We regularly help our members assess the merits of the case against them and will advise on best and worst case scenarios. Even if you have been dealing with a case yourself or have been taking legal advice from elsewhere, we can still help.

By way of an example, one of our members already had a case from a customer up and running when they joined us. The dealer knew that the customer had an RAC report undertaken at the point of sale and they knew that the report would help their case. However the customer had refused to hand over the report.

Knowing it would provide a crucial piece of evidence, as it would help prove that the issues the customer complained of were not present at the point of sale, we set about getting a copy of the report. We did this under Part 18 of the Civil Procedure Rules which, in summary, meant sending a request to the customer in a certain format and then making an application to the court following the customer’s response (which was a refusal to send the report). This led to the court ordering the customer to produce the report which together with our dealer’s own Pre Delivery Inspection report and other evidence, persuaded the judge in our favour. The customer’s case was completely dismissed.  

Would the judge have ruled the same way without the report? Quite possibly not and so the lesson here is to give your legal team as much notice as possible as even if we are not involved from the start, we can still use our legal knowledge and experience to help you get the right result.

Lawgistics members can get advice from the legal team.

Impression Communications LtdPutting the motive in automotive

Impression works with businesses across the automotive aftermarket supply chain such as parts suppliers, warehouse distributors, motor factors and independent garages. Covering all aspects of automotive aftermarket marketing, including social media, event management, customer newsletters and PR, Impression is able to quickly establish itself within a client’s business and work towards their objectives.

Nona BowkisHead of Legal Services / SolicitorRead More by this author

Related Legal Updates

Legal Disputes: Why traders should avoid direct contact

The urge to sort the matter out, or attempt to, can put a strain on the process and you may find yourself in a difficult position.

The etiquette of handling consumer complaints

It is always best practice to get involved while you have the chance and follow the correct process at the very beginning.

A settlement agreement may not protect you

An agreement does not need to be in writing to be binding, but it is much easier to prove the terms of an agreement if there is a documented paper trail.

Small Claims Mediation Pilot Scheme

I predict HMCTS (HM Courts and Tribunal Service) will announce the scheme as a success by May 2026.

Implications, assumptions, and confusion – why being clear on your actions could be key to winning

The diagnosis showed the third-party garage had failed to repair the vehicle to a satisfactory standard and this was relayed to the consumer.

Burden of proof? Get your evidence while you can!

The burden of proof reverses for issues raised between 30 days and six months of ownership.

Claim Dismissed: No Proof of Fault at Purchase

Our member argued that numerous issues could have caused the overheating and ultimate failure.

Get in touch

Complete the form to get in touch or via our details below:

Phone
01480 455500
Address

Vinpenta House
High Causeway
Whittlesey
Peterborough
PE7 1AE

By submitting this quote you agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy & Cookies Policy.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.