Finance Company Unhappy with Court Ruling

legal updates

The court found that the claim and particulars were inadequate and the finance company was told they had to submit a compliant claim/particulars.

Read our disclaimer keyboard_arrow_down

This website content is intended as a general guide to law as it applies to the motor trade. Lawgistics has taken every effort to ensure that the contents are as accurate and up to date as at the date of first publication.

The laws and opinions expressed within this website may be varied as the law develops. As such we cannot accept liability for or the consequence of, any change of law, or official guidelines since publication or any misuse of the information provided.

The opinions in this website are based upon the experience of the authors and it must be recognised that only the courts and recognised tribunals can interpret the law with authority.

Examples given within the website are based on the experience of the authors and centre upon issues that commonly give rise to disputes. Each situation in practice will be different and may comprise several points commented upon.

If you have any doubt about the correct legal position you should seek further legal advice from Lawgistics or a suitably qualified solicitor. We cannot accept liability for your failure to take professional advice where it should reasonably be sought by a prudent person.

All characters are fictitious and should not be taken as referring to any person living or dead.

Use of this website shall be considered acceptance of the terms of the disclaimer presented above.

As we are finding to be increasingly frequent, finance companies are taking court action against our members for allegedly not supplying cars that meet their own – often skewed – interpretation of the law.

In one such example, our member did not accept liability but offered (via their former legal advisors) to settle a dispute with a finance company, and to repurchase the vehicle for £7399.

The finance company refused and issued court proceedings adding little more than, “The car was not in a good, safe, satisfactory condition or fit for their purpose under the Consumer Rights Act.” There was no mention as to how or why those criteria were not supposedly met.

The court found that the claim and particulars were inadequate and the finance company was told they had to submit a compliant claim/particulars. The finance company was also ordered to pay our member’s legal representation costs of £450. 

Following receipt of the revised claim and particulars, the finance company went on to accept a full and final settlement offer of £6,672.63 which was £700 less than what they had declined before litigation!

Upon settlement, our member asked if they could now resume dealings with said finance company. The finance company declined stating, “Your client’s poor conduct has marred this process. Even these negotiations, in which we have shown nothing but goodwill, have been hampered by your client’s unreasonable behaviour.”

Go figure that one!

But this shows that no matter how meritorious, if a car dealer challenges a finance company in court it will most likely be the end of their business relationship.

HaswentWebsites for dealers small and large

Composer is a next-gen automotive platform that has been designed from the ground up to give you an intuitive way to promote your stock. You have extensive stock management options, and you'll gain a brilliantly responsive new website to advertise your stock, starting at just £39.99/month.

Jason WilliamsLegal AdvisorRead More by this author

Related Legal Updates

Upon receiving a new court claim, do not delay

The consequences of missing a court deadline can be catastrophic.

Poorly pleaded claim, dismissed with costs

This case demonstrates in stark terms the value of being properly advised.

The Advantages of a Fabian Strategy

Some people will have genuine concerns they just want to see addressed.

Judges want expert reports

Expert reports are vital to help judges fairly resolve motor trade disputes and determine faults at sale.

Double Finance Danger: Don’t get caught out!

Do not simply accept what the seller advises and drill down into any finance outstanding.

Honest guv, it was a mistake!

It is useful to know that if an employee has made a mistake, it is not that employee who is deemed liable.

Nominal Damages

The aim of the court in civil litigation is to put the parties back in the position they were in had the contract not been breached.

Get in touch

Complete the form to get in touch or via our details below:

Phone
01480 455500
Address

Vinpenta House
High Causeway
Whittlesey
Peterborough
PE7 1AE

By submitting this quote you agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy & Cookies Policy.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.