Finance company fails to mitigate loss! Standard

legal updates

The court can refuse to allow damages to a Claimant in respect of any part of the loss which is due to his own neglect to take steps.

Read our disclaimer keyboard_arrow_down

This website content is intended as a general guide to law as it applies to the motor trade. Lawgistics has taken every effort to ensure that the contents are as accurate and up to date as at the date of first publication.

The laws and opinions expressed within this website may be varied as the law develops. As such we cannot accept liability for or the consequence of, any change of law, or official guidelines since publication or any misuse of the information provided.

The opinions in this website are based upon the experience of the authors and it must be recognised that only the courts and recognised tribunals can interpret the law with authority.

Examples given within the website are based on the experience of the authors and centre upon issues that commonly give rise to disputes. Each situation in practice will be different and may comprise several points commented upon.

If you have any doubt about the correct legal position you should seek further legal advice from Lawgistics or a suitably qualified solicitor. We cannot accept liability for your failure to take professional advice where it should reasonably be sought by a prudent person.

All characters are fictitious and should not be taken as referring to any person living or dead.

Use of this website shall be considered acceptance of the terms of the disclaimer presented above.

So was the finding of the Court in a reserved written judgment handed down by the Judge following a recent small claims hearing attended by our member.

This was a claim for breach of contract arising from the sale, on finance, of a BMW for the sum of £5,995.00. The BMW was rejected by the end user/consumer, which our member did accept. Regardless, finance (the ‘Claimant’) accepted the rejection and rescinded the agreement.

Finance then sold the BMW at auction for just £924 net!

On the facts, the Judge determined that our member was liable for breach of contract having innocently misrepresented the mileage of the BMW. 

The Judge accepted evidence that the cap value of the BMW was something North of £3,000.00 and was concerned to know why it failed to achieve anything like that figure at auction. This went to the issue of mitigation. 

He considered it was very unfair that our member should wear the burden of that, particularly when evidence was given that it had offered finance some £2,995.00 to buy back the BMW, which finance had unreasonably refused.

The Judge went on to state “The Claimants have a duty to mitigate and the law certainly requires a Claimant in the position of the Claimants to take all reasonable steps to mitigate the loss consequent upon the Defendant’s wrong”.

He continued “The court can refuse to allow damages to a Claimant in respect of any part of the loss which is due to his own neglect to take steps. In other words, are there losses that the Claimant ought to have avoided”.

The Judge then quoted McGregor on Damages, which says “Even persons against whom wrongs have been committed are not entitled to sit back and suffer loss which could have been avoided by reasonable efforts or to continue any activity unreasonably so as to increase the loss”.

The Judge found that it was open to finance to have accepted our members offer. He was satisfied that it was wholly wrong for finance to have sat back and auctioned the BMW in the state it was left in by the consumer and expect our member to pay losses of more than £5,000.00.

ECSC Group plcMore Secure

On average 55 vulnerabilities are identified daily.

What can I do?

Review your organisations priorities and ask ‘can we afford a breach?’. What do I do during an incident? Who do I involve? When do I involve the ICO?

If you’re unable to answers these questions, you need help from the experts.

Howard TilneyHead of Strategy / Legal AdvisorRead More by this author

Related Legal Updates

Two Years of Lawgistics Litigation Support

Since launching Lawgistics Litigation for the Motor Trade, we’ve saved our members over £2.6 million in court claims.

Of Pedantry and Pleadings

From faulty sat navs to forgotten responsibilities, we explore how modern claims are testing the limits of common sense in legal disputes.

Concise or Incomplete? The challenges of vague pleadings by litigants in person

As online claims get shorter, your courtroom strategy needs to get sharper. Here’s why.

Recent Cases, Real Consequences – and What to Learn

From missed emails to misplaced vehicles, here are a few real-world reminders to help you avoid unnecessary headaches.

Costs of issuing proceedings and becoming a “Claimant”

Lawgistics Ltd can assist you by drafting a letter before action compliant with Pre-Action Protocols as part of the service included in your membership.

Can I claim a loss of profits?

Consideration must then be given to the three elements of a loss of profit claim.

Upon receiving a new court claim, do not delay

The consequences of missing a court deadline can be catastrophic.

Get in touch

Complete the form to get in touch or via our details below:

Phone
01480 455500
Address

Vinpenta House
High Causeway
Whittlesey
Peterborough
PE7 1AE

By submitting this quote you agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy & Cookies Policy.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.