Facebook – Beware of the #Selfie

legal updates

The employee’s Facebook profile picture had been copied and mis-used by other members of staff for distribution on an inappropriate website.

Read our disclaimer keyboard_arrow_down

This website content is intended as a general guide to law as it applies to the motor trade. Lawgistics has taken every effort to ensure that the contents are as accurate and up to date as at the date of first publication.

The laws and opinions expressed within this website may be varied as the law develops. As such we cannot accept liability for or the consequence of, any change of law, or official guidelines since publication or any misuse of the information provided.

The opinions in this website are based upon the experience of the authors and it must be recognised that only the courts and recognised tribunals can interpret the law with authority.

Examples given within the website are based on the experience of the authors and centre upon issues that commonly give rise to disputes. Each situation in practice will be different and may comprise several points commented upon.

If you have any doubt about the correct legal position you should seek further legal advice from Lawgistics or a suitably qualified solicitor. We cannot accept liability for your failure to take professional advice where it should reasonably be sought by a prudent person.

All characters are fictitious and should not be taken as referring to any person living or dead.

Use of this website shall be considered acceptance of the terms of the disclaimer presented above.

Recent report from one of our clients suggested that they had received a complaint from an employee who felt they were being bullied in the workplace, and wished for the employer to deal with the issue.

The nature of complaint was as follows: The employee’s Facebook profile picture or ‘selfies’ had been copied and mis-used by other members of staff for distribution on an inappropriate website.  Also to accompany the picture was the employees’ private phone number.  

The offended employee turned to the employer to ask them to discipline the other members of staff for the misuse of his image.   They felt they were being bullied in the workplace by their fellow colleague’s actions.  However in this instance the employer was powerless to action anything other than disapproval for the following reasons:

  1. The offended employee posted the picture on a public forum for all and sundry to see
  2. The fellow colleagues in question were friends with the employee but offended the employee on Facebook independently of the company.  As such this image was distributed to them whether they wished to see it or not.  The employees colleagues did not hack into his Facebook account to have sight of the image as such it is public property
  3. Distribution of the image was not undertaken during company time nor on the company equipment and as such it is not the employer’s responsibility to regulate the actions of their staff outside of the workplace

Whilst the employer does not condone the action of their staff they are powerless to take any further action under any company disciplinary policy.  Had the picture been distributed around the workplace, for ‘banter’ in the workplace or if it that had been used to distributed on the internet using company equipment then it would be the employer’s responsibility to deal with the employees in question.

In this instance the employer was advised to merely discuss the issue with all the members of staff highlighting that they did not feel that this was an appropriate action to take concerning a fellow colleague as it had caused them a severe distress.  There is, however, nothing that the employer can do at this stage can do at this stage.

Impression Communications LtdPutting the motive in automotive

Impression works with businesses across the automotive aftermarket supply chain such as parts suppliers, warehouse distributors, motor factors and independent garages. Covering all aspects of automotive aftermarket marketing, including social media, event management, customer newsletters and PR, Impression is able to quickly establish itself within a client’s business and work towards their objectives.

Dennis ChapmanIn remembrance of Dennis Chapman 1951 -2015Read More by this author

Related Legal Updates

Can my employees tell me it is too hot to work?

Bosses should make sure they are doing all they can to keep their people cool, especially in areas where machinery might generate extra heat.

Change management

The consequences of failing to manage workplace change effectively can increase employee resistance and deplete employee engagement.

Can a notice to terminate employment be withdrawn?

An employee’s refusal to agree to treat the notice as ineffective and to continue employment may have serious consequences.

The primary purpose of a contract of apprenticeship is training

If you take on an apprentice it is vital you have an apprenticeship agreement in place which is a contract of service.

Pandemic impact on annual leave entitlement

The change in March 2020 allowed for four weeks of annual leave to be carried over. So, as a reminder, any carried over leave must be used in 2022!

Right to work – adjusted checks extended to 30 September 2022

Job applicants and existing employees can send scanned documents or a photo of documents for checks using email or a mobile app, rather than sending originals.

Changes to pre-employment checks on the right to work in the UK

The current laws regarding pre-employment checks on foreign recruits is due to change from 6 April 2022.

Get in touch

Complete the form to get in touch or via our details below:

01480 455500

Vinpenta House
High Causeway

By submitting this quote you agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy & Cookies Policy.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.