Employees and Alcohol

legal updates

How far can employers, realistically go in terms of controlling an employee’s social habits, when alcohol is concerned?

Read our disclaimer keyboard_arrow_down

This website content is intended as a general guide to law as it applies to the motor trade. Lawgistics has taken every effort to ensure that the contents are as accurate and up to date as at the date of first publication.

The laws and opinions expressed within this website may be varied as the law develops. As such we cannot accept liability for or the consequence of, any change of law, or official guidelines since publication or any misuse of the information provided.

The opinions in this website are based upon the experience of the authors and it must be recognised that only the courts and recognised tribunals can interpret the law with authority.

Examples given within the website are based on the experience of the authors and centre upon issues that commonly give rise to disputes. Each situation in practice will be different and may comprise several points commented upon.

If you have any doubt about the correct legal position you should seek further legal advice from Lawgistics or a suitably qualified solicitor. We cannot accept liability for your failure to take professional advice where it should reasonably be sought by a prudent person.

All characters are fictitious and should not be taken as referring to any person living or dead.

Use of this website shall be considered acceptance of the terms of the disclaimer presented above.

A recent Employment Tribunal case brought about an interesting decision regarding employees and alcohol, what can an employer do if an employee arrives at work smelling of alcohol?

How far can employers, realistically go in terms of controlling an employee’s social habits, when alcohol is concerned?

In this case, the employee was a healthcare assistant, whom allegedly attended work ‘smelling’ of alcohol. The employer subsequently suspended the individual pending a full investigation, which found that this was not an isolated incident and other members of staff had previously reported similar issues. However no reports were received that this impacted on the employees conduct at work, or on their ability to perform their everyday duties.

During the suspension period the employee was admitted to hospital with oesophagitis (an inflammation of the lining of the oesophagus), which could have been caused by the employees excessive drinking. The disciplinary hearing was suspended until the employee was well enough to attend. As part of the ongoing investigation, the employer felt it would be beneficial for the employee to undertake an occupational health review, however the employee refused. The employee was later dismissed.

When making the decision to dismiss, the employer considered the smell of alcohol to be a breach of the company disciplinary policy, which clearly stated that being ‘unfit for duty’ through alcohol is a gross misconduct offence. They further considered the employees refusal to attend an Occupational Health appointment, and on this basis dismissed the employee.

The Tribunal ruled that both reasons used by the employer were incorrect, and as such the dismissal was unfair. Firstly, the employee’s work was not affected in any way, and as such the allegation of gross misconduct could not have stood. The employer made a presumption based on reports of a smell of alcohol, which they should not have done. We have previously highlighted the importance of investigations during gross misconduct hearings, and it appears in this case, the employer fell foul of the Burchell Test (the employer had a genuine belief in the employee’s guilt, held reasonable grounds for that belief, and at the time, the employer had carried out as much investigation as was reasonable in the circumstances).

Secondly, the employee was not made aware that his refusal to attend an OH appointment had influenced the decision to dismiss, which they are entitled to know at the time of dismissal. This is a clear code of the ACAS code of practice. This was also highly contradictory to the employers own substance abuse policy, which clearly stated that refusal of assistance would not be a disciplinary offence. Therefore the employer was incorrect to dismiss based on both of these. Had the employer’s policy been clearer here, the situation may have been different.

DMS NavigatorDealer Management System software for Car Sales, Aftersales and eCommerce

Our dealers use us to help them be more Efficient and Profitable!

You can use our Dealer and Lead Management software to integrate all dealership departments, both online and physical ; providing all in-house functions; Invoicing, Stock Management, Accounting and Marketing as well as interfacing for advertising, ecommerce and more.

Related Legal Updates

Extension of Redundancy Protection for Pregnancy and New Parents

Explore the strengthened redundancy protections for new parents with significant amendments to maternity, adoption, and shared parental leave rights, effective from April 2024, ensuring enhanced job security during critical family milestones.

Changes to Flexible Working

Unveil the new landscape of flexible working rights with the Employment Relations (Flexible Working) Act 2023, now granting ‘day-one’ rights to employees and setting a precedent for more adaptable workplace practices effective from 6 April 2024.

New employment legislation effective from 6 April 2024

Enhanced employee rights, offering day-one entitlements to carer’s leave, flexible working arrangements, and extended redundancy protection for pregnant employees and those on family leave.

Wages increasing from 1 April 2024

With effect from 1 April 2024, the hourly rates of pay are…

Employment Law: Carer’s Leave

The regulations explicitly safeguard employees from any detriment or dismissal resulting from taking or seeking to take carer’s leave.

Employment Law: Annual Leave Changes

Several significant changes came into force on 1 January 2024 that affect the statutory annual leave and pay entitlements.

The office Christmas party season is here

Where an employee makes comments concerning a person’s body parts or style of dress that are intended to be good-natured but are perceived as offensive…

Get in touch

Complete the form to get in touch or via our details below:

Phone
01480 455500
Address

Vinpenta House
High Causeway
Whittlesey
Peterborough
PE7 1AE

By submitting this quote you agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy & Cookies Policy.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.