Job applicants merely seeking compensation are not covered by the provisions of the Equal Treatment Directive 2000/78/EC, as the Court of Justice of the European Union recently ruled in Kratzer v R+V Allgemeine Versicherung AG, in a reference from the German domestic court.
In this case the employer, R+V, advertised trainee positions for graduates. Mr Kratzer applied and his application was rejected. He sent a written complaint to R+V demanding €14,000 in compensation for age discrimination.
R+V invited him to an interview, stating that the rejection of his application had been automatically generated and was a mistake. Mr Kratzer declined to attend the interview, insisted on the compensation payment and suggested a discussion about his future employment once the compensation is settled. He brought a claim for age discrimination in the German court. On learning that all the trainee posts had gone to women, he claimed a further €3,500 for sex discrimination.
The Court of Justice of the European Union decided that Mr Kratzer obtained the status of a job applicant with a view to compensation, and not to recruitment and employment, his status does not fall within the definition of ‘access to employment, self-employment or to occupation’. Hence the EU discrimination laws will not afford protection to vexatious job applicants.
![](https://www.lawgistics.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/CFMC-logo-003-367x367.jpg)
Stocking only premium EV charging cables, we ensure you experience a stress-free EV charge, over and over, confidently backed by our 2 year warranty. Our premium & reliable charging cables are compliant with EU & UK safety standards. We offer free next day delivery* on all EV charging cables when shipped within mainland UK.
![Kiril Moskovchuk](https://www.lawgistics.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/KM1-scaled.jpg)