Disability discrimination and the employer’s knowledge


An employer cannot rely on lack of knowledge of a link between an employee’s misconduct and the disability.

Author: Kiril Moskovchuk
Reading time: 3 minutes

This article is 4 years old.

Read our disclaimer keyboard_arrow_down

This website content is intended as a general guide to law as it applies to the motor trade. Lawgistics has taken every effort to ensure that the contents are as accurate and up to date as at the date of first publication.

The laws and opinions expressed within this website may be varied as the law develops. As such we cannot accept liability for or the consequence of, any change of law, or official guidelines since publication or any misuse of the information provided.

The opinions in this website are based upon the experience of the authors and it must be recognised that only the courts and recognised tribunals can interpret the law with authority.

Examples given within the website are based on the experience of the authors and centre upon issues that commonly give rise to disputes. Each situation in practice will be different and may comprise several points commented upon.

If you have any doubt about the correct legal position you should seek further legal advice from Lawgistics or a suitably qualified solicitor. We cannot accept liability for your failure to take professional advice where it should reasonably be sought by a prudent person.

All characters are fictitious and should not be taken as referring to any person living or dead.

Use of this website shall be considered acceptance of the terms of the disclaimer presented above.

In a recent case the courts looked into discrimination arising out of disability and specifically into whether the employer must be aware that the act of its employee, which led to unfavourable treatment, was linked to the employee’s disability.

The Employment Tribunal answered in the negative: for the discrimination claim to stand, this employer’s knowledge of the link to disability is not required. On appeal, the Employment Appeal Tribunal and the Court of Appeal both agreed.

The claim was brought by a school teacher with cystic fibrosis. This is a chronic condition and amounted to disability. The school initially introduced some reasonable adjustment to help the teacher cope with his workload. Then a new syllabus was introduced, which significantly increased the workload for the teacher. In amending the syllabus no account was taken of the reasonable adjustments or of the teacher’s disability – the school argued for the simple reason that the decision maker who introduced the new syllabus was not aware. The teacher complained but no effective steps were taken to address his complaint. His health deteriorated significantly. Then the teacher showed an 18-rated film to his small class of vulnerable 15-16 year olds.  The school considered this as gross misconduct and the teacher was summarily dismissed. Importantly, the disciplinary panel did not have the records of the previous reasonable adjustments or of the teacher’s complaint.

The teacher accepted that showing of the film was utterly inappropriate. He then argued that he had to cope with the increased work load, of which he previously complained, which, in view of his ill health and disability, caused the error of his judgement. The school declined to accept this argument as a valid excuse for his misconduct. A claim to the Employment Tribunal followed: the teacher claimed his dismissal was unfair and that he suffered discrimination.

The Employment Tribunal found that the dismissal was within the band of reasonable responses and therefore fair. The school did not score so well in regard to discrimination claims. The Tribunal, rather unsurprisingly, found the school failed to make reasonable adjustments. Then, having accepted that the school in dismissing the teacher did not know that the act of gross misconduct was linked to his disability, found that the act of dismissal was discriminatory. The finding in respect of discrimination arising out of disability is an important one: upheld on two appeals, it clarifies the employer cannot rely on its lack of knowledge of the link between the employee’s misconduct and the disability.

Kiril Moskovchuk

Legal Advisor

Read more by this author

Getting in touch

You can contact us via the form or you can call us on 01480 455500.