Claim struck out due to serious and significant breaches…

legal updates

One hopes this outcome signals a more robust and uncompromising approach from the judiciary to flagrant and repeated breaches of court directions and rules by lay consumers.

Read our disclaimer keyboard_arrow_down

This website content is intended as a general guide to law as it applies to the motor trade. Lawgistics has taken every effort to ensure that the contents are as accurate and up to date as at the date of first publication.

The laws and opinions expressed within this website may be varied as the law develops. As such we cannot accept liability for or the consequence of, any change of law, or official guidelines since publication or any misuse of the information provided.

The opinions in this website are based upon the experience of the authors and it must be recognised that only the courts and recognised tribunals can interpret the law with authority.

Examples given within the website are based on the experience of the authors and centre upon issues that commonly give rise to disputes. Each situation in practice will be different and may comprise several points commented upon.

If you have any doubt about the correct legal position you should seek further legal advice from Lawgistics or a suitably qualified solicitor. We cannot accept liability for your failure to take professional advice where it should reasonably be sought by a prudent person.

All characters are fictitious and should not be taken as referring to any person living or dead.

Use of this website shall be considered acceptance of the terms of the disclaimer presented above.

So was the outcome of a recent claim faced by our member where the Claimant (the consumer) failed to comply with not one, not two, but three specific directions of the court.

In addition, the Claimant had failed to comply with CPR Part 22.1 by omitting to include a statement of truth in his undated witness statement.

The judge found that such failures were “…serious and significant breaches” and after considering the court’s duty under CPR 3.1A, Article 6 ECHR, and the overriding objective, the claim against our member was struck out pursuant to CPR 3.4(2)(c).

One hopes this outcome signals a more robust and uncompromising approach from the judiciary to flagrant and repeated breaches of court directions and rules by lay consumers, but of course, by the same token, this applies to all parties to any proceedings. It is imperative that directions are complied with fully and on time. If you have any doubts, speak with Lawgistics Litigation.

DMS NavigatorDealer Management System software for Car Sales, Aftersales and eCommerce

Our dealers use us to help them be more Efficient and Profitable!

You can use our Dealer and Lead Management software to integrate all dealership departments, both online and physical ; providing all in-house functions; Invoicing, Stock Management, Accounting and Marketing as well as interfacing for advertising, ecommerce and more.

Related Legal Updates

County Court Chaos: When the Portal Fails and Justice Falters

When the County Court portal went down minutes before a 4pm deadline, the response we received summed up a wider problem users now face.

To strike or not to strike

Courts are reluctant to strike out a claim or defence, even where there are procedural breaches. Here’s when CPR 3.4(2) genuinely applies, why summary judgment under Part 24 may be a better route, and what judges look for before taking the drastic step.

Don’t Ignore That Claim Form: How to stop enforcement and protect your credit

Got a claim form through the door? Here’s what to do first, how to avoid a County Court Judgment, what happens if enforcement starts, and when it’s smarter to settle and move on.

Default judgment but no claim form?

Here’s how to act quickly, get the paperwork you need, and give yourself the best chance of setting the judgment aside under rule 13.3.

Importance of taking your customers’ details!

Garages aren’t legally required to take a customer’s address before repair or sale, but skipping it can stall Torts notices and court action when vehicles are abandoned or not collected.

Mediation appointments: the court’s take on ‘delays’

You can tell the court you’re unavailable, but will that stop a telephone mediation being listed? In our client’s case it didn’t, and the refusal to move it now means a full hearing next year.

Witness Statements: Own the Weakness and Turn Up to Court

Courts are scrutinising credibility more than ever. A Witness Statement that ducks its weak points or a witness who fails to attend risks serious damage to their case

Get in touch

Complete the form to get in touch or via our details below:

Phone
01480 455500
Address

Vinpenta House
High Causeway
Whittlesey
Peterborough
PE7 1AE

By submitting this quote you agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy & Cookies Policy.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.