Capability Dismissals

legal updates

Is there a genuine belief that the employee is not capable of undertaking the job at hand.

Read our disclaimer keyboard_arrow_down

This website content is intended as a general guide to law as it applies to the motor trade. Lawgistics has taken every effort to ensure that the contents are as accurate and up to date as at the date of first publication.

The laws and opinions expressed within this website may be varied as the law develops. As such we cannot accept liability for or the consequence of, any change of law, or official guidelines since publication or any misuse of the information provided.

The opinions in this website are based upon the experience of the authors and it must be recognised that only the courts and recognised tribunals can interpret the law with authority.

Examples given within the website are based on the experience of the authors and centre upon issues that commonly give rise to disputes. Each situation in practice will be different and may comprise several points commented upon.

If you have any doubt about the correct legal position you should seek further legal advice from Lawgistics or a suitably qualified solicitor. We cannot accept liability for your failure to take professional advice where it should reasonably be sought by a prudent person.

All characters are fictitious and should not be taken as referring to any person living or dead.

Use of this website shall be considered acceptance of the terms of the disclaimer presented above.

Recent case law suggests that dismissals based on capability must be subject to the same standard of proof as a conduct case, applying 3 Steps:

1) Is there a genuine belief that the employee is not capable of undertaking the job at hand

If so:

2) has reasonable investigation been undertaken into the medical condition/ well-being of the employee on which a decision can be made

If so:

3) Can a genuine decision now be made, with reasonable justifiable grounds to back up that decision?

If all three of these steps are undertaken and can be proven, then a dismissal on the grounds of capability should be deemed fair. Employers should look to make thorough investigation before any decision is made in regards to capability so as to cover their own backs.

Brave AgencyDriving growth in the automotive industry

Brave is an award-winning digital agency offering a comprehensive range of services aimed at helping your business grow. From rebrands and web development to marketing campaigns that get you noticed, we do it all. Since 2000, we’ve helped businesses across the automotive sector reach new heights. Could yours be next?

Dennis ChapmanIn remembrance of Dennis Chapman 1951 -2015Read More by this author

Related Legal Updates

What are you signing up for?

Long story short, you should carefully read any T&Cs provided to you and seek to ensure you understand any implications that your agreement may impose on you in the future.

Lawgistics review WSG warranty offering

As with most of the warranties we have reviewed, WSG’s options are limited in going above and beyond a consumer’s statutory rights and also limit claims in other areas that would ordinarily be covered.

Be careful of what you promise

Estoppel by representation is a rule that prevents someone from denying a set of facts or a statement that they previously represented as being true.

Disclose or not to disclose, that is the question

It is imperative that you know what is required to be disclosed, when to disclose the documents, and what your legal duty is both before proceedings and when a claim is issued.

Court Rules Against ‘Serial Returner’ in Distance Selling Dispute

It is clear from his evidence that his true intention was that he wanted the ability to reject the car at a time of his choosing.

Indemnities – Handle with Care!

Indemnity clauses are usually onerous by design and drafted in broad terms so dealers should not make the mistake of overlooking them.

Detailed records avoid post-sale issues

The Claimant was only entitled to compensation for the cost of repairs to the locks, which were considered likely to have been faulty at the point of sale and was awarded £385.

Get in touch

Complete the form to get in touch or via our details below:

Phone
01480 455500
Address

Vinpenta House
High Causeway
Whittlesey
Peterborough
PE7 1AE

By submitting this quote you agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy & Cookies Policy.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.