An issue of fitness

legal updates

We doubt many car dealers will be putting their employees through bleep tests.

Read our disclaimer keyboard_arrow_down

This website content is intended as a general guide to law as it applies to the motor trade. Lawgistics has taken every effort to ensure that the contents are as accurate and up to date as at the date of first publication.

The laws and opinions expressed within this website may be varied as the law develops. As such we cannot accept liability for or the consequence of, any change of law, or official guidelines since publication or any misuse of the information provided.

The opinions in this website are based upon the experience of the authors and it must be recognised that only the courts and recognised tribunals can interpret the law with authority.

Examples given within the website are based on the experience of the authors and centre upon issues that commonly give rise to disputes. Each situation in practice will be different and may comprise several points commented upon.

If you have any doubt about the correct legal position you should seek further legal advice from Lawgistics or a suitably qualified solicitor. We cannot accept liability for your failure to take professional advice where it should reasonably be sought by a prudent person.

All characters are fictitious and should not be taken as referring to any person living or dead.

Use of this website shall be considered acceptance of the terms of the disclaimer presented above.

An ongoing employment tribunal claim this week is considering whether Surrey Police have discriminated against an employee after she failed a bleep test.

The Detective Constable (Rebecca Tiffin) is suing Surrey Police for disability and sex discrimination. She has an underactive thyroid gland and says that this has caused issues with weight gain, depression, stress and anxiety and allegedly has a history of regular absences from work. In 2012 her new line manager introduced a new training regime which involved a bleep test. This involves running back and forth between two cones in increasingly shorter periods of time.

On the first arranged date Tiffin asked for the training to be rescheduled as she had childcare issues. The employer allegedly told her this was not good enough. She did attend the training on that date but had a sinus infection so did not take part in the bleep test- She therefore failed the training. A month later she was told she had four months to retake the training and pass. Unfortunately, Tiffin failed the bleep tests after a few attempts and was therefore put into the unsatisfactory performance procedure which could have lead to her dismissal from the police force. Surrey Police say that all officers are required to pass the test to show they are fit enough to carry out their duties and that they had made efforts to allow Tiffin to take part in practice runs to help her prepare for the tests. Tiffin says that her disabilities are ultimately the reason she was unable to pass the test.

We doubt many car dealers will be putting their employees through bleep tests, however, it is worth noting the impact that disabilities can have on various roles employees are expected to carry out and therefore if employees are suffering from health conditions then you should always seek advice when dealing with such issues.

The tribunal is ongoing and we will keep you up to date with the outcome of the hearing.

ECSC Group plcMore Secure

On average 55 vulnerabilities are identified daily.

What can I do?

Review your organisations priorities and ask ‘can we afford a breach?’. What do I do during an incident? Who do I involve? When do I involve the ICO?

If you’re unable to answers these questions, you need help from the experts.

Stephanie StrachanIn remembrance of Stephanie Strachan 1990-2020Read More by this author

Related Legal Updates

Extension of Redundancy Protection for Pregnancy and New Parents

Explore the strengthened redundancy protections for new parents with significant amendments to maternity, adoption, and shared parental leave rights, effective from April 2024, ensuring enhanced job security during critical family milestones.

Wages increasing from 1 April 2024

With effect from 1 April 2024, the hourly rates of pay are…

Employment Law: Carer’s Leave

The regulations explicitly safeguard employees from any detriment or dismissal resulting from taking or seeking to take carer’s leave.

Employment Law: Annual Leave Changes

Several significant changes came into force on 1 January 2024 that affect the statutory annual leave and pay entitlements.

The office Christmas party season is here

Where an employee makes comments concerning a person’s body parts or style of dress that are intended to be good-natured but are perceived as offensive…

Update on Rights to Flexible Working Requests

Employers will remain entitled to turn down a request pointing to reasonable grounds as a basis for refusal.

Three new employment laws for 2024

The Carers Leave Act, The Neonatal Care (Leave and Pay) Act and The Protection from Redundancy (Pregnancy and Family Leave) Act.

Get in touch

Complete the form to get in touch or via our details below:

01480 455500

Vinpenta House
High Causeway

By submitting this quote you agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy & Cookies Policy.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.