An eventful small claims hearing

legal updates

Discover how a simple oversight in witness representation and off-screen coaching at a remote hearing can dramatically impact legal outcomes, underscoring the critical need for adherence to procedural rules and proper pre-action conduct in our latest insightful article.

Read our disclaimer keyboard_arrow_down

This website content is intended as a general guide to law as it applies to the motor trade. Lawgistics has taken every effort to ensure that the contents are as accurate and up to date as at the date of first publication.

The laws and opinions expressed within this website may be varied as the law develops. As such we cannot accept liability for or the consequence of, any change of law, or official guidelines since publication or any misuse of the information provided.

The opinions in this website are based upon the experience of the authors and it must be recognised that only the courts and recognised tribunals can interpret the law with authority.

Examples given within the website are based on the experience of the authors and centre upon issues that commonly give rise to disputes. Each situation in practice will be different and may comprise several points commented upon.

If you have any doubt about the correct legal position you should seek further legal advice from Lawgistics or a suitably qualified solicitor. We cannot accept liability for your failure to take professional advice where it should reasonably be sought by a prudent person.

All characters are fictitious and should not be taken as referring to any person living or dead.

Use of this website shall be considered acceptance of the terms of the disclaimer presented above.

A recent remote small claims hearing highlighted issues with witness evidence. The Defendant company, our member, sent a different representative to the hearing than he who had signed the witness statement, due to illness. As a result, the only evidence was the witness statement and no testimony was given. 

At the same remote hearing, the Claimant was being coached off-screen by a third party, which was so obvious that the judge had to explain his duty to him. Part 32 of the Civil Procedure Rules governs evidence in civil proceedings, in particular, part 32.4(1) which states:

“A witness statement is a written statement signed by a person which contains the evidence which that person would be allowed to give orally.”  

The Claimant in the case issued proceedings after he was refused a full refund for his vehicle, despite our member having offered a repair, which was the only remedy available after 30 days of ownership.

The judge found that:

  • The Claimant was not entitled to a full refund.
  • The claim was inflated.
  • The second diagnosis was confirmation of the first and could not be claimed.
  • The Claimant had not provided adequate opportunity, as required under the CRA 2015, for the Defendant to diagnose the fault.

The Claimant was awarded £600 of a £5000 claim. However, the judge awarded £800 in costs, the submission cost, and the hearing fee. Given the submission cost is proportionate to the sum of the claim, and only 10% of the claim was awarded, permission to appeal the point was sought. Permission to appeal was refused on the grounds that as part of the claim had been granted, costs should follow. 

Despite the issue about costs, our member was happy with the outcome having successfully argued the Claimant had not given them the opportunity to avoid litigation by appropriate pre-action conduct. 

We always advise our members that, even though the Defendant may be a limited company in the majority of cases, the person attending the hearing to give evidence must be the same person who gave and signed the witness statement. In this case, our member was happy with the outcome, but the consequences of not having the opportunity to speak and ask questions of the other party at a hearing can be detrimental.

DMS NavigatorDealer Management System software for Car Sales, Aftersales and eCommerce

Our dealers use us to help them be more Efficient and Profitable!

You can use our Dealer and Lead Management software to integrate all dealership departments, both online and physical ; providing all in-house functions; Invoicing, Stock Management, Accounting and Marketing as well as interfacing for advertising, ecommerce and more.

Polly DaviesLegal AdvisorRead More by this author

Related Legal Updates

Time is Money – Pay Attention!

Whether the court has made a mistake that impacts your case, or if the postman has lost your court paperwork, as soon as an issue arises, action is needed.

SHOCK & HORROR! A finance company seeks to influence an expert opinion!

Any finance house thinking of or seeking to emulate such unconscionable conduct, risks not only judicial ire and sanction but also being named and shamed.

Petty Grievances

Dealers can rest assured that the courts still take a very dim view of petty grievances blown out of proportion.

Default Judgments & Set Aside Applications – When is late too late?

This article explores the complexities and urgent timing needed to set aside default judgments in County Court, highlighting the importance of prompt legal action.

Why a good defence is essential

Delays are never helpful, and the sooner we get the claim form, the sooner we can get to work on your defence.

It pays to take professional advice on a court claim

Experience remarkable savings and expert legal support for your motor trade business with our competitively priced services.

Proceed with caution: legal pitfalls in caravan and motorhome deals

Curious if one of these vehicles is in your possession? Verify your stock and arm yourself with essential legal knowledge to navigate any potential challenges.

Get in touch

Complete the form to get in touch or via our details below:

01480 455500

Vinpenta House
High Causeway

By submitting this quote you agree to our Terms & Conditions and Privacy & Cookies Policy.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.